These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22251834)

  • 1. Distractors slow information accumulation in simple feature search.
    Kent C; Howard CJ; Gilchrist ID
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22251834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.
    Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?
    Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Display probability modulates attentional capture by onset distractors.
    Sayim B; Grubert A; Herzog MH; Krummenacher J
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):10.1-8. PubMed ID: 20377287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.
    Giordano AM; McElree B; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):30.1-10. PubMed ID: 19757969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: a signal detection model.
    Santhi N; Reeves A
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1235-56. PubMed ID: 15066389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach.
    Kyllingsbæk S; Sy JL; Giesbrecht B
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1487-97. PubMed ID: 21145901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors.
    Carrasco M; Giordano AM; McElree B
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1351-65. PubMed ID: 15066395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is contrast just another feature for visual selective attention?
    Pashler H; Dobkins K; Huang L
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1403-10. PubMed ID: 15066399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adults with dyslexia exhibit large effects of crowding, increased dependence on cues, and detrimental effects of distractors in visual search tasks.
    Moores E; Cassim R; Talcott JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Dec; 49(14):3881-90. PubMed ID: 22019772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is attention essential for inducing synesthetic colors? Evidence from oculomotor distractors.
    Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):21.1-9. PubMed ID: 19761312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of distractors in multiple object tracking are modulated by the similarity of distractor and target features.
    Feria CS
    Perception; 2012; 41(3):287-304. PubMed ID: 22808583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.