130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22252968)
21. Intracochlear electrocochleography during cochlear implantation.
Calloway NH; Fitzpatrick DC; Campbell AP; Iseli C; Pulver S; Buchman CA; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1451-7. PubMed ID: 24892369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
Snyder RL; Middlebrooks JC; Bonham BH
Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: Localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation.
Tamames I; King C; Bas E; Dietrich WD; Telischi F; Rajguru SM
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():32-9. PubMed ID: 27260269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A gerbil model of sloping sensorineural hearing loss.
Suberman TA; Campbell AP; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Roche JP; Fitzpatrick DC
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 21389900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation to Enhance Response Interpretation.
Sijgers L; Pfiffner F; Grosse J; Dillier N; Koka K; Röösli C; Huber A; Dalbert A
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521990594. PubMed ID: 33710919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Summating Potential Is a Reliable Marker of Electrode Position in Electrocochleography: Cochlear Implant as a Theragnostic Probe.
Helmstaedter V; Lenarz T; Erfurt P; Kral A; Baumhoff P
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):687-700. PubMed ID: 29251689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intracochlear potential distribution with intracochlear and extracochlear electrical stimulation in humans.
Kasper A; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Oct; 100(10):812-6. PubMed ID: 1952647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hearing loss patterns after cochlear implantation via the round window in an animal model.
Attias J; Hod R; Raveh E; Mizrachi A; Avraham KB; Lenz DR; Nageris BI
Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 26954875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electrophysiological Evidence of the Basilar-Membrane Travelling Wave and Frequency Place Coding of Sound in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Campbell L; Bester C; Iseli C; Sly D; Dragovic A; Gummer AW; O'Leary S
Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):180-189. PubMed ID: 29084395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of Intracochlear Trauma Caused by Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays through Different Quadrants of the Round Window.
Martins Gde S; Brito Neto RV; Tsuji RK; Gebrim EM; Bento RF
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():236364. PubMed ID: 26236719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Usefulness of Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess the Functionality of the Cochlear Nerve Using an Intracochlear Test Electrode.
Lassaletta L; Polak M; Huesers J; Díaz-Gómez M; Calvino M; Varela-Nieto I; Gavilán J
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e413-e420. PubMed ID: 29076926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Using Extracochlear Stimulation at Different Cochlear Sites: A Comparison With Intracochlear Stimulation.
Sunwoo W; Goo W; Oh SH
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 May; 17(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 38273767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intraoperative monitoring using cochlear microphonics in cochlear implant patients with residual hearing.
Radeloff A; Shehata-Dieler W; Scherzed A; Rak K; Harnisch W; Hagen R; Mlynski R
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 22377649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats.
Leake PA; Snyder RL; Hradek GT; Rebscher SJ
Hear Res; 1995 Jan; 82(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 7744715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation.
Boggess WJ; Baker JE; Balkany TJ
Laryngoscope; 1989 Oct; 99(10 Pt 1):1002-5. PubMed ID: 2796546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of different electrodes used in bone-guided extracochlear implants on electrical stimulation of auditory nerves in guinea pigs.
Liu CH; Lu YS; Chen PC; Lee CF
Tzu Chi Med J; 2021; 33(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 33505877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
