These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve dysfunction: comparison with Ionescu-Shiley valve. Kobayashi Y; Nagata S; Eishi K; Nakano K; Miyatake K Am Heart J; 1998 Jun; 135(6 Pt 1):1086-92. PubMed ID: 9630116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves. Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance. Jamieson WR; Allen P; Miyagishima RT; Gerein AN; Munro AI; Burr LH; Tyers GF J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results. Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients. McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves. Goldman B; Scully H; Tong C; Mandell R; Butany J; Azuma J; Schwartz L Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves. Williams GA; Labovitz AJ Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses]. Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft. Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of a patient selection policy. Louagie Y; Noirhomme P; Aranguis E; Eucher P; Vanruyssevelt P; Buche M; Dion R; Jaumin P; Schoevaerdts JC; Chalant CH J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Oct; 104(4):1013-24. PubMed ID: 1405658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis. A new generation tissue valve with excellent intermediate clinical performance. Jamieson WR; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Gerein AN; Janusz MT; Tyers GF; Allen P J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Oct; 96(4):652-66. PubMed ID: 3172812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses. Eric Jamieson WR; Marchand MA; Pelletier CL; Norton R; Pellerin M; Dubiel TW; Aupart MR; Daenen WJ; Holden MP; David TE; Ryba EA; Anderson WN J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial. Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]