These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22254708)

  • 1. Physiological variables and subjective symptoms by 60 Hz magnetic field in EHS and non-EHS persons.
    Nam KC; Choi JL; Kwon MK; Jang KH; Kim DW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1925-8. PubMed ID: 22254708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Origins of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to 60 Hz magnetic fields: A provocation study.
    Kim DW; Choi JL; Nam KC; Yang DI; Kwon MK
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 May; 33(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 22012875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of radiation emitted by WCDMA mobile phones on electromagnetic hypersensitive subjects.
    Kwon MK; Choi JY; Kim SK; Yoo TK; Kim DW
    Environ Health; 2012 Sep; 11():69. PubMed ID: 22998837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of RF fields emitted from smart phones on cardio-respiratory parameters: a preliminary provocation study.
    Kwon MK; Nam KC; Lee DS; Jang KH; Kim DW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1961-4. PubMed ID: 22254717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of 60 Hz magnetic fields on teenagers and adults.
    Kim SK; Choi JL; Kwon MK; Choi JY; Kim DW
    Environ Health; 2013 May; 12():42. PubMed ID: 23705754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study.
    Nam KC; Lee JH; Noh HW; Cha EJ; Kim NH; Kim DW
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Dec; 30(8):641-50. PubMed ID: 19551766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone.
    Kim DW; Lee JH; Ji HC; Kim SC; Nam KC; Cha EJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2322-5. PubMed ID: 19163166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Provocation study of persons with perceived electrical hypersensitivity and controls using magnetic field exposure and recording of electrophysiological characteristics.
    Lyskov E; Sandström M; Mild KH
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2001 Oct; 22(7):457-62. PubMed ID: 11568930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of electric current perception thresholds of different EHS groups.
    Schröttner J; Leitgeb N; Hillert L
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Apr; 28(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 17080457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses.
    Belyaev I; Dean A; Eger H; Hubmann G; Jandrisovits R; Kern M; Kundi M; Moshammer H; Lercher P; Müller K; Oberfeld G; Ohnsorge P; Pelzmann P; Scheingraber C; Thill R
    Rev Environ Health; 2016 Sep; 31(3):363-97. PubMed ID: 27454111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heavy metal exposure in patients suffering from electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
    Ghezel-Ahmadi D; Engel A; Weidemann J; Budnik LT; Baur X; Frick U; Hauser S; Dahmen N
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Jan; 408(4):774-8. PubMed ID: 19932500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey.
    Hillert L; Berglind N; Arnetz BB; Bellander T
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2002 Feb; 28(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 11871850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: fact or fiction?
    Genuis SJ; Lipp CT
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 414():103-12. PubMed ID: 22153604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hypothesis on how to measure electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
    Tuengler A; von Klitzing L
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2013 Sep; 32(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 23301924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Subjective non-specific symptoms related with electromagnetic fields: description of 2 cases].
    Gobba F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 26(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 12408003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electromagnetic field induced biological effects in humans.
    Kaszuba-Zwoińska J; Gremba J; Gałdzińska-Calik B; Wójcik-Piotrowicz K; Thor PJ
    Przegl Lek; 2015; 72(11):636-41. PubMed ID: 27012122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity--an increasing challenge to the medical profession.
    Hedendahl L; Carlberg M; Hardell L
    Rev Environ Health; 2015; 30(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 26372109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses.
    Dieudonné M
    Environ Health; 2020 May; 19(1):48. PubMed ID: 32375774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An assessment of the autonomic nervous system in the electrohypersensitive population: a heart rate variability and skin conductance study.
    Andrianome S; Gobert J; Hugueville L; Stéphan-Blanchard E; Telliez F; Selmaoui B
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2017 Nov; 123(5):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 28620054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Project NEMESIS: perception of a 50 Hz electric and magnetic field at low intensities (laboratory experiment).
    Mueller CH; Krueger H; Schierz C
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Jan; 23(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 11793403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.