These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22255756)

  • 1. Automatic Dent-landmark detection in 3-D CBCT dental volumes.
    Cheng E; Chen J; Yang J; Deng H; Wu Y; Megalooikonomou V; Gable B; Ling H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6204-7. PubMed ID: 22255756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull.
    Neelapu BC; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Gupta A; Vasamsetti S; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170054. PubMed ID: 28845693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes.
    Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 29957312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.
    Codari M; Caffini M; Tartaglia GM; Sforza C; Baselli G
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 27358080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Update on cone beam technology and orthodontic analysis.
    Kau CH; Li JL; Li Q; Abou Kheir N
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):653-69. PubMed ID: 24993927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long term three dimensional tracking of orthodontic patients using registered cone beam CT and photogrammetry.
    Boulanger P; Flores-Mir C; Ramirez JF; Mesa E; Branch JW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3525-8. PubMed ID: 19964997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Context-guided fully convolutional networks for joint craniomaxillofacial bone segmentation and landmark digitization.
    Zhang J; Liu M; Wang L; Chen S; Yuan P; Li J; Shen SG; Tang Z; Chen KC; Xia JJ; Shen D
    Med Image Anal; 2020 Feb; 60():101621. PubMed ID: 31816592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic Craniomaxillofacial Landmark Digitization via Segmentation-Guided Partially-Joint Regression Forest Model and Multiscale Statistical Features.
    Zhang J; Gao Y; Wang L; Tang Z; Xia JJ; Shen D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1820-1829. PubMed ID: 26625402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study.
    Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections.
    Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 29501121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High temporal resolution and streak-free four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.
    Leng S; Tang J; Zambelli J; Nett B; Tolakanahalli R; Chen GH
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):5653-73. PubMed ID: 18812650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of cephalometric diagnosis in orthodontics.
    da Silva MB; Sant'Anna EF
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):63-71. PubMed ID: 24094013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The accuracy and reliability of different midsagittal planes in the symmetry assessment using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Yu S; Zheng Y; Dong L; Huang W; Wu H; Zhang Q; Yan X; Wu W; Lv T; Yuan X
    Clin Anat; 2024 Mar; 37(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 38186377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working with DICOM craniofacial images.
    Grauer D; Cevidanes LS; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):460-70. PubMed ID: 19732681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics.
    Nervina JM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():95-102. PubMed ID: 22376101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
    Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.