These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22256141)

  • 1. Breast skin-line detection using dynamic programming.
    Silva CA; Lima CG; Correia JH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7775-8. PubMed ID: 22256141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Mar; 42(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 15125150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast mass segmentation in mammography using plane fitting and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Jiang L; Jin R; Zhang L; Yuan Y; Li Q
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 19362024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of the breast skin-line in mammograms using multidirectional Gabor filters.
    Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangeri F; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1870-81. PubMed ID: 24209932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic detection of the breast border and nipple position on digital mammograms using genetic algorithm for asymmetry approach to detection of microcalcifications.
    Karnan M; Thangavel K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Jul; 87(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17543415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms.
    Rampun A; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Winder J
    Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():28-41. PubMed ID: 28606722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic extraction of pectoral muscle in the MLO view of mammograms.
    Feudjio CK; Klein J; Tiedeu A; Colot O
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(23):8493-515. PubMed ID: 24240510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mesh-free based variational level set evolution for breast region segmentation and abnormality detection using mammograms.
    Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P; Giakos G
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Jan; 34(1):. PubMed ID: 28603939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms.
    Berber T; Alpkocak A; Balci P; Dicle O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23273502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography.
    Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):958-71. PubMed ID: 15191279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments.
    Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Zagrouba E
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 64():79-90. PubMed ID: 26151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation.
    Borges LR; Oliveira HCR; Nunes PF; Bakic PR; Maidment ADA; Vieira MAC
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2704-2714. PubMed ID: 27277017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of a novel mass detection algorithm in mammograms.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M; Minaei B; Domingues I
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(4):592-600. PubMed ID: 24518702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of adaptive-neighborhood contrast enhancement on the extraction of the breast skin-line in mammograms.
    Sun Y; Janer R; Suri J; Ye Z; Rangayyan R
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2005; 2005():3475-8. PubMed ID: 17280972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: CAD system application to MIAS database.
    Ibrahim N; Fujita H; Hara T; Endo T
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2577-89. PubMed ID: 9434310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fully automated segmentation of whole breast using dynamic programming in dynamic contrast enhanced MR images.
    Jiang L; Hu X; Xiao Q; Gu Y; Li Q
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2400-2414. PubMed ID: 28375584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.