These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22256451)

  • 1. Medical staff closure antitrust considerations.
    Gordon L
    Health Care Law Mon; 2011 Dec; 2011(12):2-6. PubMed ID: 22256451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Denials of staff privileges face increased antitrust scrutiny.
    Jacobsen RA; Wiggins RB
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1992; 17(4):7-15. PubMed ID: 1428862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Denial of staff privileges and referrals: antitrust litigation.
    Snyder EK
    Appl Radiol; 1989 Sep; 18(9):33-4. PubMed ID: 10304418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antitrust challenges by allied health care professionals involving hospital staff privileges.
    Sfikas PM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Dec; 24(12):361-69, 374. PubMed ID: 10115233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission.
    Horoschak MJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
    Hammack JM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High court broadens antitrust risks.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Jun; 21(22):3. PubMed ID: 10110771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspective: antitrust litigation by aggrieved physicians.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1994 Apr; 11(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 10132992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fla. physician appeals ruling on antitrust claim.
    Greene J
    Mod Healthc; 1992 May; 22(21):6. PubMed ID: 10118154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antitrust: hospitals may grant C-section privileges only to obstetricians.
    Romanow K
    J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(1):111-2. PubMed ID: 11521265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Third Circuit allows physician's federal antitrust suit to be tried.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1996 Oct; 13(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 10161769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physician's antitrust claims rejected. Levine v. Central Florida Medical Affiliates.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1996 Sep; 13(11):6-8. PubMed ID: 10184578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The medical staff and fraud?
    Welch SS; Burnette J
    J Med Assoc Ga; 2013; 102(4):42, 44. PubMed ID: 24665505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avoiding antitrust liability for denial of access to resources: some safe harbors.
    Ettinger DA; Soltis KJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 10114113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Summary judgment against physician in antitrust litigation reversed. Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Inc.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Sep; 17(11):6-8. PubMed ID: 11186480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antitrust laws affect nurses.
    Avery LH
    AORN J; 1994 Apr; 59(4):905-9. PubMed ID: 8210248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who'll win this high-stakes battle over privileges?
    Crane M
    Med Econ; 1991 Mar; 68(6):81, 84-5. PubMed ID: 10109580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court grants HCQIA immunity in antitrust suit by physician. Smith v. Ricks.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Jun; 10(8):3-5. PubMed ID: 10183876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospital and doctors granted antitrust immunity in important peer review lawsuit. Austin v. McNamara.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Feb; 8(2):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.