These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The physician cartel--potential hospital federal antitrust liability in class-based denial of staff privileges to clinical psychologists. Rypma JA Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1991 Jul; (149):7-33. PubMed ID: 10112686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims? Cross LL Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Antitrust immunity granted in a far-reaching peer review case. Austin v. McNamara. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):19, 29. PubMed ID: 10183820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Curtailing medical staff privileges: a case study. Kaminski K QRC Advis; 1997 Mar; 13(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 10164985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Antitrust protection extended to hospital authorities and physician peer review participants. Crosby v. Hospital Authority of Valdosta. Roeder KH; Sledge SK Ga Hosp Today; 1996 Nov; 40(11):3. PubMed ID: 10184649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of medical staff using fiscal factors: economic credentialing. Blum JD J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Mar; 26(3):65-72, 82. PubMed ID: 10127073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Will my resignation from the medical staff save me from a data bank report? Schulte DJ Mich Med; 2009; 108(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 19489350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. What physicians should know about the antitrust laws. Miles JJ Allergy Proc; 1993; 14(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 8157165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Antitrust Act applies to hospitals. Davis CD Healthtexas; 1991 Aug; 47(2):21. PubMed ID: 10112947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Austin decision good news for peer reviewers. Hudson T Hospitals; 1993 Jan; 67(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 8419281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Austin v. McNamara: antitrust immunity for peer review under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Herzog JP; Fisher DR Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10183844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Antitrust issues for the nurse anesthetist: areas of concern. Recht PR; Garg RK Nurse Anesth; 1992 Jun; 3(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 1606205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospital medical staff privilege issues: "brother's keeper" revisited. Copeland WM; Brown PE Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Nov; (153):7-19. PubMed ID: 10114837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Physicians fighting on new fronts. Levine v. Central Florida Medical Affiliates, Inc. Hershey N Hosp Law Newsl; 1995 Sep; 12(11):4-7. PubMed ID: 10184396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Economics at heart of Marshfield Clinic case. Greenberg W Mod Healthc; 1995 Jul; 25(27):26. PubMed ID: 10143774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Limiting act's protection of physicians defeats aim of patient protection. Gittleman EP J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 8130838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Supreme Court expands view of interstate commerce in peer review proceeding. Neugebauer JE Physician Exec; 1991; 17(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 10183511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Upcoming Supreme Court decisions crucial for hospitals. Weissburg C; Arnold LR Health Syst Rev; 1991; 24(1):43-4, 50-1. PubMed ID: 10110616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]