152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22257112)
41. Subjective reports of stimulus, response, and decision times in speeded tasks: how accurate are decision time reports?
Miller J; Vieweg P; Kruize N; McLea B
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):1013-36. PubMed ID: 20580268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Adaptive learning via selectionism and Bayesianism, Part I: connection between the two.
Zhang J
Neural Netw; 2009 Apr; 22(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 19386469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A model of the uncertainty effects in choice reaction time that includes a major contribution from effector selection.
Wright CE; Marino VF; Chubb C; Mann D
Psychol Rev; 2019 Jul; 126(4):550-577. PubMed ID: 31081647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Increased sensitivity to error during decision-making in bipolar disorder patients with acute mania.
Minassian A; Paulus MP; Perry W
J Affect Disord; 2004 Oct; 82(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 15488248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Improving Bayesian credibility intervals for classifier error rates using maximum entropy empirical priors.
Gustafsson MG; Wallman M; Wickenberg Bolin U; Göransson H; Fryknäs M; Andersson CR; Isaksson A
Artif Intell Med; 2010 Jun; 49(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 20347582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Word learning as Bayesian inference.
Xu F; Tenenbaum JB
Psychol Rev; 2007 Apr; 114(2):245-72. PubMed ID: 17500627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for Bayesian decisions.
Sundareswara R; Schrater PR
J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):12.1-19. PubMed ID: 18842083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.
Brown S; Steyvers M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):587-99. PubMed ID: 16060767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Decision strategy: effect of the proportion of total response time taken by choice reaction time].
Proteau L; Leroux M; Lévesque L; Girouard Y
Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1986 Dec; 11(4):191-204. PubMed ID: 3815710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Scale (in)variance in a unified diffusion model of decision making and timing.
Simen P; Vlasov K; Papadakis S
Psychol Rev; 2016 Mar; 123(2):151-81. PubMed ID: 26461957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Strength and weight: The determinants of choice and confidence.
Kvam PD; Pleskac TJ
Cognition; 2016 Jul; 152():170-180. PubMed ID: 27093221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Modeling accuracy, response time, and bias in continuous orientation judgments.
Kvam PD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):301-318. PubMed ID: 30714760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples.
Vul E; Goodman N; Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):599-637. PubMed ID: 24467492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A hierarchical bayesian model of human decision-making on an optimal stopping problem.
Lee MD
Cogn Sci; 2006 May; 30(3):1-26. PubMed ID: 21702820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Bayesian outcome-based strategy classification.
Lee MD
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 25697091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. In the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects, alternatives are repeatedly compared in pairs on single dimensions.
Noguchi T; Stewart N
Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 24762922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. How should witnesses regulate the accuracy of their identification decisions: one step forward, two steps back?
Perfect TJ; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1810-8. PubMed ID: 22563633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Bayesian analysis of the piecewise diffusion decision model.
Holmes WR; Trueblood JS
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):730-743. PubMed ID: 28597236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Bayesian accounts of covert selective attention: A tutorial review.
Vincent BT
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1013-32. PubMed ID: 25762302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Heuristic use of perceptual evidence leads to dissociation between performance and metacognitive sensitivity.
Maniscalco B; Peters MA; Lau H
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):923-37. PubMed ID: 26791233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
