These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22257711)

  • 1. Repetition, not number of sources, increases both susceptibility to misinformation and confidence in the accuracy of eyewitnesses.
    Foster JL; Huthwaite T; Yesberg JA; Garry M; Loftus EF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 22257711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of calibration for reconstructed eye-witness memories.
    Bonham AJ; González-Vallejo C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 19362279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's eyewitness memory: repeating post-event misinformation reduces the distinctiveness of a witnessed event.
    Bright-Paul A; Jarrold C
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):818-35. PubMed ID: 22963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.
    Chan JC; Thomas AK; Bulevich JB
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19037905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative - not absolute - judgments of credibility affect susceptibility to misinformation conveyed during discussion.
    French L; Garry M; Mori K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 21112042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidence-accuracy resolution in the misinformation paradigm is influenced by the availability of source cues.
    Horry R; Colton LM; Williamson P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():164-73. PubMed ID: 24983514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of age on remembering and knowing misinformation.
    Saunders J; Jess A
    Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20013464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The co-witness misinformation effect: memory blends or memory compliance?
    Skagerberg EM; Wright DB
    Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 18432487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of false memory over time: is memory for misinformation "remembered" or "known"?
    Frost P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 11082861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of confederate influence and confidence on the accuracy of crime judgements.
    Ost J; Ghonouie H; Cook L; Vrij A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 17976500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When a lie becomes the truth: the effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.
    Pickel KL
    Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 15098618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.
    Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS
    Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.
    Charman SD; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extracting the truth from conflicting eyewitness reports: a formal modeling approach.
    Waubert de Puiseau B; Aßfalg A; Erdfelder E; Bernstein DM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):390-403. PubMed ID: 23088437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.
    Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postidentification feedback affects real eyewitnesses.
    Wright DB; Skagerberg EM
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Feb; 18(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 17425539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paradoxical effects of testing: retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses.
    Chan JC; Langley MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 20919785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dark side of testing memory: repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility.
    Chan JC; Lapaglia JA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):418-32. PubMed ID: 21859229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-event information presented in a question form eliminates the misinformation effect.
    Lee YS; Chen KN
    Br J Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 23320446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.