These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22257786)

  • 1. Can virtual reality simulation help to determine the importance of stereopsis in intraocular surgery?
    Waqar S; Williams O; Park J; Modi N; Kersey T; Sleep T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 96(5):742-6. PubMed ID: 22257786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety of nondominant-hand ophthalmic surgery.
    Park J; Williams O; Waqar S; Modi N; Kersey T; Sleep T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2112-6. PubMed ID: 23084362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stereoacuity and intraocular surgical skill: effect of stereoacuity level on virtual reality intraocular surgical performance.
    Selvander M; Åsman P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2188-93. PubMed ID: 22108113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning styles and the prospective ophthalmologist.
    Modi N; Williams O; Swampillai AJ; Waqar S; Park J; Kersey TL; Sleep T
    Med Teach; 2015 Apr; 37(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 25333714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Construct validity of anterior segment anti-tremor and forceps surgical simulator training modules: attending versus resident surgeon performance.
    Mahr MA; Hodge DO
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):980-5. PubMed ID: 18499005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual reality ophthalmic surgical simulation as a feasible training and assessment tool: results of a multicentre study.
    Le TD; Adatia FA; Lam WC
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 46(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 21283159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of hand- and foot-activated surgical tools in simulated ophthalmic surgery.
    Podbielski DW; Noble J; Gill HS; Sit M; Lam WC
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2012 Oct; 47(5):414-7. PubMed ID: 23036541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of stereopsis on the ability to perform simulated microsurgery.
    Dutton J; Watkins A; Henderson J; Burgess FR; Tint NL; Dhillon B; Tatham AJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Apr; 46(4):549-554. PubMed ID: 32271521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BVAT distance vs. near stereopsis screening of strabismus, strabismic amblyopia and refractive amblyopia; a prospective study of 68 patients.
    Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2000; 15(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 10960226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of patients with deficient stereoacuity on the EYESi microsurgical simulator.
    Sachdeva R; Traboulsi EI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 151(3):427-33.e1. PubMed ID: 21236407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between stereopsis and visual acuity after occlusion therapy for amblyopia.
    Lee SY; Isenberg SJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Nov; 110(11):2088-92. PubMed ID: 14597513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of stereoscopic vision on task performance with an operating microscope.
    Nibourg LM; Wanders W; Cornelissen FW; Koopmans SA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1919-25. PubMed ID: 26476669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binocular status after surgery for constant and intermittent exotropia.
    Wu H; Sun J; Xia X; Xu L; Xu X
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Nov; 142(5):822-6. PubMed ID: 17056364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in adults with acquired strabismus.
    Fawcett SL; Stager DR; Felius J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 15629283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Depth of focus in eyes with diffractive bifocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Schmidinger G; Geitzenauer W; Hahsle B; Klemen UM; Skorpik C; Pieh S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1650-6. PubMed ID: 17010862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtual reality cataract surgery training: learning curves and concurrent validity.
    Selvander M; Åsman P
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):412-7. PubMed ID: 21054818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
    Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual reality simulation in acquiring and differentiating basic ophthalmic microsurgical skills.
    Solverson DJ; Mazzoli RA; Raymond WR; Nelson ML; Hansen EA; Torres MF; Bhandari A; Hartranft CD
    Simul Healthc; 2009; 4(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 19444047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ophthalmic surgical simulation: a new era.
    Gillan SN; Saleh GM
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1623-4. PubMed ID: 24337557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudophakic monovision using monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: hybrid monovision.
    Iida Y; Shimizu K; Ito M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):2001-5. PubMed ID: 22018364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.