These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22257869)

  • 1. A novel approach for filling tunnel-prepared teeth with composites of two different consistencies: a case presentation.
    Ebert J; Frankenberger R; Petschelt A
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Feb; 43(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 22257869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement.
    Nash RW; Lowe RA; Leinfelder K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1099-104. PubMed ID: 11575016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resin composite contours.
    Sidelsky H
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contemporary restoration of Class II caries. Direct posterior composites.
    Abel MG
    Dent Today; 2002 Nov; 21(11):94-7. PubMed ID: 12483933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 133(10):1387-98. PubMed ID: 12403542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimize finishing and polishing of posterior composites.
    Blank JT
    Dent Today; 2014 Mar; 33(3):118, 120-1. PubMed ID: 24791326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voids and porosities in class I micropreparations filled with various resin composites.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; de Boer T; Pesschier D; Bronkhorst E
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 12540112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year clinical evaluation of two flowable composites.
    Gallo JR; Burgess JO; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Maltezos MB; Mercante DE; Davidson JM
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jun; 41(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 20490392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restoring class II cavities with composite resin, utilising the bulk filling technique.
    Lally U
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014; 60(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 24812757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expediting Class II posterior composite placement.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2001 Oct; 20(10):96-8, 100-1. PubMed ID: 11665424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restoration of posterior teeth using occlusal matrix technique.
    Martos J; Silveira LF; Ferrer-Luque CM; Gonzalez-López S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(4):596-9. PubMed ID: 21187632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesion, layering, and finishing of resin composite restorations for class II cavity preparations.
    Ferraris F
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(2):210-21. PubMed ID: 19655566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handling characteristics of resin composites in posterior teeth.
    Ferrari M; Kugel G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1998 Sep; 19(9):879-82, 884, 886 passim; quiz 894. PubMed ID: 9852801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior composites: a practical guide revisited.
    Mackenzie L; Burke FJ; Shortall AC
    Dent Update; 2012 Apr; 39(3):211-2, 215-6. PubMed ID: 22675892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.