These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22258118)
1. The end of evidence-based medicine? Clark DA Inflammopharmacology; 2012 Aug; 20(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 22258118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conflict of Evidence: Resolving Discrepancies When Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-analyses Disagree. Sylvester RJ; Canfield SE; Lam TB; Marconi L; MacLennan S; Yuan Y; MacLennan G; Norrie J; Omar MI; Bruins HM; Hernández V; Plass K; Van Poppel H; N'Dow J Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):811-819. PubMed ID: 27914898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The principles and practice of evidence-based neonatology. Soll RF; Andruscavage L Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):215-24. PubMed ID: 9917465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data. Clarke MJ; Stewart LA J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9238566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews: a foundation for evidence-based perinatal medicine. Ohlsson A Acta Paediatr; 1996 Jun; 85(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 8816197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians' knowledge, attitudes and professional use of RCTs and meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey. De Vito C; Nobile CG; Furnari G; Pavia M; De Giusti M; Angelillo IF; Villari P Eur J Public Health; 2009 Jun; 19(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 19129347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: why not just live together? Faraoni D; Schaefer ST BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 27769172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs. Colditz GA Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials. Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Smith HS Pain Physician; 2008; 11(6):717-73. PubMed ID: 19057624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized controlled trials in evidence-based mental health care: getting the right answer to the right question. Essock SM; Drake RE; Frank RG; McGuire TG Schizophr Bull; 2003; 29(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 12908666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Secondary use of randomized controlled trials to evaluate drug safety: a review of methodological considerations. Hammad TA; Pinheiro SP; Neyarapally GA Clin Trials; 2011 Oct; 8(5):559-70. PubMed ID: 21878445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying the results of quantitative systematic reviews to clinical practice. Lee A; Gin T Anesth Analg; 2002 Feb; 94(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 11812702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. QUOROM and the search for an updated 'clinical method' in the era of evidence-based medicine. Casali PG; Licitra L; Bruzzi P Ann Oncol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):923-5. PubMed ID: 11038027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence-based medicine. Interpreting studies and setting policy. Woolf SH; George JN Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2000 Aug; 14(4):761-84. PubMed ID: 10949772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How can good randomized controlled trials in leading journals be so misinterpreted? Veith FJ J Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 57(2 Suppl):3S-7S. PubMed ID: 23336854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]