These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22258568)

  • 21. Through the gaps.
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):335. PubMed ID: 23002451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety?
    Wells F
    Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 11652183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meeting targets lab lapses.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2013 May; 497(7449):300-1. PubMed ID: 23676733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
    Sovacool BK
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The road to fraud starts with a single step.
    Crocker J
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7372):151. PubMed ID: 22071724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Whistle-blower breaks his silence.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7485):593-4. PubMed ID: 24476864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When conflicted becomes corrupted II--the Molette doctrine. By Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2012 Jan; 125(Pt 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 22400129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Second chances.
    Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7606):152. PubMed ID: 27279172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Misconduct mayhem.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):122-3. PubMed ID: 16721916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7554):14-5. PubMed ID: 26040873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breeding cheats.
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):242-3. PubMed ID: 17230160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing.
    Vie KJ
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2020 Aug; 16(1):6. PubMed ID: 32761302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Data audit as a way to prevent/contain misconduct.
    Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):369-79. PubMed ID: 24028483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Scientists behaving badly.
    Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud.
    Jia H
    Nat Med; 2006 Aug; 12(8):867. PubMed ID: 16892019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
    Cohen P
    New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.