These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. California hospital saves by standardizing orthopedic supplies. Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 Aug; 20(8):15. PubMed ID: 10144454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthopedic devices; effective data of requirement for premarket approval for hip joint metal/polymer or ceramic/polymer semiconstrained resurfacing cemented prosthesis. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS Fed Regist; 2004 Oct; 69(191):59132-4. PubMed ID: 15460583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Substantially equivalent": the FDA, orthopedic device manufacturer, and you. Shaw JA J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15660052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Registries as a tool for optimizing safety of endoprostheses. Experiences from other countries and the setup of the German arthroplasty register]. Hassenpflug J; Liebs TR Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Dec; 57(12):1376-83. PubMed ID: 25367173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The next critical role of orthopedic registries. Malchau H; Graves SE; Porter M; Harris WH; Troelsen A Acta Orthop; 2015 Feb; 86(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25583041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The natural history of new orthopaedic devices. Bhattacharyya T; Blyler C; Shenaq D Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Oct; 451():263-6. PubMed ID: 16906061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries: overview and summary. Sedrakyan A; Paxton EW; Phillips C; Namba R; Funahashi T; Barber T; Sculco T; Padgett D; Wright T; Marinac-Dabic D J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():1-12. PubMed ID: 22262417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The evidence-based approach in bringing new orthopaedic devices to market. Schemitsch EH; Bhandari M; Boden SD; Bourne RB; Bozic KJ; Jacobs JJ; Zdero R J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 92(4):1030-7. PubMed ID: 20360530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A national endoprosthesis registry for hand surgery]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(3):270. PubMed ID: 15977108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sharing the risk in the use of TMJ protheses. Christensen RW J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 59(8):963. PubMed ID: 11474470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Making simulation tests for hip joint prostheses more exact]. Gatti A; Trentani C Chir Organi Mov; 1977; 63(6):543-50. PubMed ID: 616389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Two new general orthopaedic instruments. Wilkinson MC Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1996 May; 78(3 ( Pt 1)):184-5. PubMed ID: 8779499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [TEP (total endoprosthesis)-meter for the evaluation of total endoprostheses of the hip joint]. Seidel H Chirurg; 1979 Apr; 50(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 446241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthopedic devices; reclassification of the intervertebral body fusion device. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS Fed Regist; 2007 Jun; 72(112):32170-2. PubMed ID: 17632942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical devices, health care, and consensus standards. Lemons JE Stand News; 2001 Jan; 29(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 11833592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An American implant registry: a clinical use trip wire. Maloney WJ Orthopedics; 2002 Sep; 25(9):923-4. PubMed ID: 12269411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]