201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22258911)
1. [Chief expert opinion in psychodynamic therapy - a contribution on ensuring quality in standardized German psychotherapy. Findings from the MARS-Project].
Lieberz K; Seiffge M
Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2011; 57(4):364-76. PubMed ID: 22258911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Initial and extension applications for psychodynamic therapy according to the German Guidelines for Psychotherapy].
Lieberz K; Krumm B; Adamek L; Mühlig S
Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2010; 56(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 20963717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Operationalized psychodynamic diagnostic (OPD)--potential for quality assurance].
Heuft G; Jakobsen T; Kriebel R; Schneider W; Rudolf G
Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2005; 51(3):261-76. PubMed ID: 16281349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A retrospective study of expert opinions of a psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic university hospital for public and private customers over a period of 12 years].
Uhlenbrock J; Hinrichs J; Heuft G
Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2017 Sep; 63(3):234-250. PubMed ID: 28974178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Expert assessment of rehabilitation for social medicine legal experts--a discussion contribution to quality assurance. From the Quality Management Study Group of the German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention].
Berg A; Hackhausen W; Jochheim KA; Leistner K; Schreiber U
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1999 May; 38(2):107-26. PubMed ID: 10413803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality criteria in psychiatric expert practice].
Winckler P; Foerster K
Versicherungsmedizin; 1994 Apr; 46(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 8197664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The IREPRO List of Indicators--a tool for systematic evaluation of the prognosis for reintegration and the need for rehabilitation in the course of psychiatric disability pension assessment].
Hesse B; Gebauer E; Heuft G
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Feb; 46(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 17315131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Guidance of medical experts].
Nüchtern E; Mohrmann M
Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Jun; 73(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 20549598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effectiveness of inpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy: a follow-up study].
Huber D; Albrecht C; Hautum A; Henrich G; Klug G
Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2009; 55(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 19402022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ["Deficiencies in the mandatory health insurance system"--possibilities and limits of medical expert assessment].
Mayer ED; Boukamp K; Zink J; Simoes E; Schwoerer P
Gesundheitswesen; 2000 Oct; 62(10):538-46. PubMed ID: 11103565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical pathways and guidelines reflected in malpractice judgment].
Ulsenheimer K
Urologe A; 2003 May; 42(5):705-7. PubMed ID: 12858866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Decision of German Supreme Court on July 30, 1999 relating to scientific evidence requirements for psychological expert opinion with respect to credibility of testimony and its consequences for future expert consultation].
Balloff R
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2000 Apr; 49(4):261-74. PubMed ID: 10850124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quality assurance in sociomedical decision processes exemplified by documentation of occupational anamnesis in final sociomedical expert assessment].
Seger W
Gesundheitswesen; 1994; 56(8-9):430-8. PubMed ID: 8000164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quality criteria and quality standards--social medicine expert assessment and its effectiveness in the social insurance system].
Schulte R
Gesundheitswesen; 1998 Jan; 60(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 9522559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expert opinion on "best practices" in the delivery of health care services to immigrants in Denmark.
Jensen NK; Nielsen SS; Krasnik A
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Aug; 57(8):A4170. PubMed ID: 20682134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Critique of expert opinion].
Bremora T
Pflege Z; 2001 May; 54(5):362. PubMed ID: 12025556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The Olympic Games of psychotherapy: research evaluation of psychotherapy regulations].
Kaiser E
Psyche (Stuttg); 1993 Sep; 47(9):882-95. PubMed ID: 8210451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ring trials in expert assessment--a practicable procedure for quality assurance?].
Lederer P; Weber A; Strebl H; Schmid K
Gesundheitswesen; 1996 Mar; 58(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8645902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Expert assessment within the scope of legal social determination of the extent of economic responsibility of insurance for analytic psychotherapy].
Kächele H; Pfäfflin F; Simons C
Psyche (Stuttg); 1995 Feb; 49(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 7886245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experiences with expert assessment in guardianship law from the forensic psychiatry viewpoint].
von Oefele K
Gesundheitswesen; 1994 Apr; 56(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 8019065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
