167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2225962)
1. Progressive functional deterioration of bioprostheses assessed by Doppler ultrasonography.
Hoffmann A; Weiss P; Dubach P; Burckhardt D
Chest; 1990 Nov; 98(5):1165-8. PubMed ID: 2225962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-invasive assessment by Doppler ultrasound of 155 patients with bioprosthetic valves: a comparison of the Wessex porcine, low profile Ionescu-Shiley, and Hancock pericardial bioprostheses.
Simpson IA; Reece IJ; Houston AB; Hutton I; Wheatley DJ; Cobbe SM
Br Heart J; 1986 Jul; 56(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 3524634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves.
Williams GA; Labovitz AJ
Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulsed, continuous, and color flow Doppler echocardiographic assessment of normal and abnormal Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves.
Jacobs LE; Parry WR; Kotler MN
J Card Surg; 1988 Sep; 3(3 Suppl):429-35. PubMed ID: 2980046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation.
Blauwet LA; Malouf JF; Connolly HM; Hodge DO; Evans KN; Herges RM; Sundt TM; Miller FA
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Jun; 23(6):656-66. PubMed ID: 20497863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A Doppler echocardiographic study of normal and dysfunctioning Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses].
Bonaduce D; Breglio R; Conforti G; Montemurro MV; Petretta M; Covino E; Morgano G; Bianchi V
G Ital Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 20(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 2328859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve dysfunction: comparison with Ionescu-Shiley valve.
Kobayashi Y; Nagata S; Eishi K; Nakano K; Miyatake K
Am Heart J; 1998 Jun; 135(6 Pt 1):1086-92. PubMed ID: 9630116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of bioprosthetic valve failure after 10 years.
Teoh KH; Ivanov J; Weisel RD; Daniel LB; Darcel IC; Rakowski H
Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV110-6. PubMed ID: 2225395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Doppler haemodynamic profiles of clinically and echocardiographically normal mitral and aortic valve prostheses.
Nihoyannopoulos P; Kambouroglou D; Athanassopoulos G; Nadazdin A; Smith P; Oakley CM
Eur Heart J; 1992 Mar; 13(3):348-55. PubMed ID: 1597221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commissural dehiscence of Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprostheses. Explant analysis and pathogenesis.
Nistal JF; Hurlé A; Gutiérrez JA; Mazorra F; Revuelta JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Sep; 110(3):688-95; discussion 695-6. PubMed ID: 7564435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of new pericardial bioprostheses by pulsed and continuous Doppler ultrasound ].
Lesbre JP; Chassat C; Lespérance J; Petitclerc R; Bonan R; Dyrda I; Pasternac A; Bourassa M
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Sep; 79(10):1439-48. PubMed ID: 3099678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro assessment of prosthesis type and pressure recovery characteristics: Doppler echocardiography overestimation of bileaflet mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve gradients.
Bach DS; Schmitz C; Dohmen G; Aaronson KD; Steinseifer U; Kleine P
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Aug; 144(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 22264413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study.
Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P
J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term Doppler echocardiographic results of aortic or mitral valve replacement with Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS; Berggren HE; Larsson S; Roberts B; Wallentin I; Caidahl K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Oct; 116(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 9766588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of the design on the medium to long-term hemodynamic behavior of 19 mm pericardial aortic valve prostheses.
Gonzalez-Juanatey JR; Garcia-Bengoechea JB; Garcia-Acuna JM; Vega Fernandez M; Amaro Cendon A; Varela Roman A; Gil de la Pena M
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S317-23. PubMed ID: 8953461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of Doppler-obtained velocity curves in functional evaluation of mechanical prosthetic valves in the mitral and aortic positions.
Goldrath N; Zimes R; Vered Z
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1988; 1(3):211-25. PubMed ID: 3272769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
