198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22260763)
21. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic posterior vaginal plication plus sacral colpopexy for severe posterior vaginal prolapse: A randomized clinical trial.
Morciano A; Ercoli A; Caliandro D; Campagna G; Panico G; Giaquinto A; Zullo MA; Tinelli A; Scambia G; Marzo G; Cervigni M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Jan; 42(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 36135387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight.
Mahoney C; Scott G; Dwyer L; Reid F; Ward K; Smith A; Kearney R
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2041-2048. PubMed ID: 30810783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse with percutaneous surgical system: Results from a pilot study.
Campagna G; Panico G; Morciano A; Vacca L; Anchora LP; Gallucci V; Cervigni M; Ercoli A; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():160-165. PubMed ID: 29310041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraocular pressure change during laparoscopic sacral colpopexy in patients with normal tension glaucoma.
Moriyama Y; Miwa K; Yamada T; Sawaki A; Nishino Y; Kitagawa Y
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1933-1938. PubMed ID: 30643979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications.
Filmar GA; Fisher HW; Aranda E; Lotze PM
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1645-53. PubMed ID: 24819328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ohno MS; Richardson ML; Sokol ER
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 26282093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic Management of Vaginal Vault Prolapse Recurring after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
Mearini L; Nunzi E; Di Biase M; Costantini E
Urol Int; 2016; 97(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 26757152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Colposacropexy Using a Percutaneous Surgical System: A Case Report.
Romano F; Legge F; Scambia G; Guido M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):536-537. PubMed ID: 27919731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surgical management of recurrent upper vaginal prolapse following sacral colpopexy.
Haya N; Maher M; Ballard E
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1243-5. PubMed ID: 25693654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: The "6-Points" Technique.
Schaub M; Lecointre L; Faller E; Boisramé T; Baldauf JJ; Wattiez A; Akladios CY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1081-1082. PubMed ID: 28435129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel transvaginal approach to correct recurrent apical prolapse after failed sacral colpopexy: case series.
Bracken JN; Tran DH; Kuehl TJ; Larsen W; Yandell PM; Shull BL
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1429-33. PubMed ID: 22527557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Posterior Compartment Surgery Provides No Differential Benefit for Defecatory Symptoms Before or After Concomitant Mesh-Augmented Apical Suspension.
Arunachalam D; Hale DS; Heit MH
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):183-187. PubMed ID: 29319557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with polyester fiber suture: Ozerkan modification.
Ozerkan K; Orhan A; Kasapoglu I; Ata B; Uncu G
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Aug; 31(8):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 31289875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.
Maher C; Baessler K; Glazener CM; Adams EJ; Hagen S
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 18092333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
