These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22260902)

  • 1. Biomechanical examination of the 'plateau phenomenon' in ActiGraph vertical activity counts.
    John D; Miller R; Kozey-Keadle S; Caldwell G; Freedson P
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Feb; 33(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 22260902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sampling frequency affects the processing of Actigraph raw acceleration data to activity counts.
    Brønd JC; Arvidsson D
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2016 Feb; 120(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 26635347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of speed and step frequency during walking and running on motion sensor output.
    Rowlands AV; Stone MR; Eston RG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Apr; 39(4):716-27. PubMed ID: 17414811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ActiGraph counts processing and the assessment of vigorous activity.
    Brønd JC; Aadland E; Andersen LB; Resaland GK; Andersen SA; Arvidsson D
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2019 Jul; 39(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 30980611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ground reaction force estimates from ActiGraph GT3X+ hip accelerations.
    Neugebauer JM; Collins KH; Hawkins DA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99023. PubMed ID: 24914946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Both a single sacral marker and the whole-body center of mass accurately estimate peak vertical ground reaction force in running.
    Patoz A; Lussiana T; Breine B; Gindre C; Malatesta D
    Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():186-192. PubMed ID: 34325223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generating ActiGraph Counts from Raw Acceleration Recorded by an Alternative Monitor.
    Brønd JC; Andersen LB; Arvidsson D
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Nov; 49(11):2351-2360. PubMed ID: 28604558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Biomechanical Re-Examination of Physical Activity Measurement with Accelerometers.
    Fridolfsson J; Börjesson M; Arvidsson D
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30314272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Walking beyond preferred transition speed increases muscle activations with a shift from inverted pendulum to spring mass model in lower extremity.
    Shih Y; Chen YC; Lee YS; Chan MS; Shiang TY
    Gait Posture; 2016 May; 46():5-10. PubMed ID: 27131169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of four ActiGraph accelerometers during walking and running.
    John D; Tyo B; Bassett DR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Feb; 42(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 19927022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of accelerometry to classify activity beneficial to bone in premenopausal women.
    Stiles VH; Griew PJ; Rowlands AV
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Dec; 45(12):2353-61. PubMed ID: 23698245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.
    Santos-Lozano A; Santín-Medeiros F; Cardon G; Torres-Luque G; Bailón R; Bergmeir C; Ruiz JR; Lucia A; Garatachea N
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-pass filter cutoff frequency affects sacral-mounted inertial measurement unit estimations of peak vertical ground reaction force and contact time during treadmill running.
    Day EM; Alcantara RS; McGeehan MA; Grabowski AM; Hahn ME
    J Biomech; 2021 Apr; 119():110323. PubMed ID: 33609984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying symmetry in running gait using a single inertial sensor.
    Lee JB; Sutter KJ; Askew CD; Burkett BJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2010 Sep; 13(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 19850518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.
    Sasaki JE; John D; Freedson PS
    J Sci Med Sport; 2011 Sep; 14(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 21616714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting Ground Reaction Force from a Hip-Borne Accelerometer during Load Carriage.
    Neugebauer JM; Lafiandra M
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Nov; 50(11):2369-2374. PubMed ID: 29889819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Site-specific Concurrent Validity of the ActiGraph GT9X Link in the Estimation of Activity-related Skeletal Loading.
    Higgins S; Higgins LQ; Vallabhajosula S
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2021 May; 53(5):951-959. PubMed ID: 33170820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "What Is a Step?" Differences in How a Step Is Detected among Three Popular Activity Monitors That Have Impacted Physical Activity Research.
    John D; Morton A; Arguello D; Lyden K; Bassett D
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Apr; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 29662048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peak impact accelerations during track and treadmill running.
    Bigelow EM; Elvin NG; Elvin AA; Arnoczky SP
    J Appl Biomech; 2013 Oct; 29(5):639-44. PubMed ID: 23182887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cost of transport of human running is not affected, as in walking, by wide acceleration/deceleration cycles.
    Minetti AE; Gaudino P; Seminati E; Cazzola D
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2013 Feb; 114(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 23221963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.