These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22261305)

  • 1. Typicality mediates performance during category verification in both ad-hoc and well-defined categories.
    Sandberg C; Sebastian R; Kiran S
    J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(2):69-83. PubMed ID: 22261305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding semantic and phonological processing deficits in adults with aphasia: Effects of category and typicality.
    Meier EL; Lo M; Kiran S
    Aphasiology; 2016; 30(6):719-749. PubMed ID: 27041784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic Typicality Effects in Primary Progressive Aphasia.
    Riley EA; Barbieri E; Weintraub S; Mesulam MM; Thompson CK
    Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen; 2018 Aug; 33(5):292-300. PubMed ID: 29544341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Working Memory Load and Typicality on Semantic Processing in Aphasia.
    Obermeyer J; Reinert L; Kamen R; Pritchard D; Park H; Martin N
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Jan; 31(1):12-29. PubMed ID: 34138658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of category generation and retrieval in aphasia: effect of typicality of category items.
    Kiran S; Sandberg C; Sebastian R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1101-17. PubMed ID: 21173393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Representation of semantic typicality in brain activation in healthy adults and individuals with aphasia: A multi-voxel pattern analysis.
    Li R; Perrachione TK; Tourville JA; Kiran S
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 158():107893. PubMed ID: 34022187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Naming unique entities in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease: Towards a better understanding of the semantic impairment.
    Montembeault M; Brambati SM; Joubert S; Boukadi M; Chapleau M; Laforce RJ; Wilson MA; Macoir J; Rouleau I
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():11-20. PubMed ID: 27939367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit access to semantic information.
    Young AW; Newcombe F; Hellawell D; De Haan E
    Brain Cogn; 1989 Nov; 11(2):186-209. PubMed ID: 2803760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: evidence from well-defined categories.
    Kiran S; Johnson L
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2008 Nov; 17(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 18845698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Pre-semantic" cognition revisited: critical differences between semantic aphasia and semantic dementia.
    Jefferies E; Rogers TT; Hopper S; Ralph MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):248-61. PubMed ID: 19766662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Typicality of words produced on a semantic fluency task in amnesic mild cognitive impairment: linguistic analysis and risk of conversion to dementia.
    Vita MG; Marra C; Spinelli P; Caprara A; Scaricamazza E; Castelli D; Canulli S; Gainotti G; Quaranta D
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2014; 42(4):1171-8. PubMed ID: 25024315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What some effects might not be: the time to verify membership in "well-defined" categories.
    Larochelle S; Richard S; Soulières I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):929-61. PubMed ID: 11131822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concept typicality responses in the semantic memory network.
    Santi A; Raposo A; Frade S; Marques JF
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):167-175. PubMed ID: 27789333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does typicality of category members affect the deductive reasoning? An ERP study.
    Lei Y; Li F; Long C; Li P; Chen Q; Ni Y; Li H
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 204(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 20512485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Taxonomic and ad hoc categorization within the two cerebral hemispheres.
    Shen Y; Aharoni BE; Mashal N
    Laterality; 2015; 20(5):517-29. PubMed ID: 25644310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of childhood hearing loss on organization of semantic memory: typicality and relatedness.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Dougherty M; Mehta J; Spence M
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):686-702. PubMed ID: 17086079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Typicality of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia treatment: further evidence for semantic complexity.
    Kiran S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1550-68. PubMed ID: 18695023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The origins of age of acquisition and typicality effects: Semantic processing in aphasia and the ageing brain.
    Räling R; Schröder A; Wartenburger I
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jun; 86():80-92. PubMed ID: 27106392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using concept typicality to explore semantic representation and control in healthy ageing.
    Alves M; Figueiredo P; Roberto MS; Raposo A
    Cogn Process; 2021 Aug; 22(3):539-552. PubMed ID: 33928471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factor structure and clinical applicability of new semantic tasks in Alzheimer's disease and aphasia.
    Luotonen I; Karrasch M; Korpilahti P; Renvall K
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2024; 31(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 34658274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.