These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22261322)
1. Impulse control and criminal responsibility: lessons from neuroscience. Penney S Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 22261322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: judicial standards of wrongfulness since M'Naghten. Goldstein RL; Rotter M Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 3069146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane. Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience. Aharoni E; Funk C; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Gazzaniga M Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Mar; 1124():145-60. PubMed ID: 18400929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are there lessons to be learned from a more scientific approach to mental condition defences? Claydon L Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 22296969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part II: A systematic analysis of exculpatory delusions. Goldstein RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 2706336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should a personality disorder qualify as a mental disease in insanity adjudication? Bonnie RJ J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(4):760-3. PubMed ID: 21105939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus. Cobun LS Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part III: Postpartum depression and the "appreciation" of wrongfulness. Goldstein RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 2758116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurologic disorder and criminal responsibility. Yaffe G Handb Clin Neurol; 2013; 118():345-56. PubMed ID: 24182391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irresistible impulse: legal viewpoint. Borichansky L Med Law; 1989; 8(5):471-4. PubMed ID: 2517970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison of four insanity defense standards. Wettstein RM; Mulvey EP; Rogers R Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jan; 148(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 1984702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mental incapacity defenses at the War Crimes Tribunal: questions and controversy. Sparr LF J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 15809241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. America's First Weiss KJ; Gupta N J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Dec; 46(4):503-512. PubMed ID: 30593481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal insanity: assessment of the inability to refrain. Donohue A; Arya V; Fitch L; Hammen D Psychiatry (Edgmont); 2008 Mar; 5(3):58-66. PubMed ID: 19727300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seeing responsibility: can neuroimaging teach us anything about moral and legal responsibility? Wasserman D; Johnston J Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; Spec No():S37-49. PubMed ID: 24634084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [History of psychiatry and the criminally insane in Japan]. Nakatani Y Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2003; 105(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 12708015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]