These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22262392)
21. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Sasso RC; Anderson PA; Riew KD; Heller JG Orthopedics; 2011 Nov; 34(11):889. PubMed ID: 22050256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Artificial intervertebral disc arthroplasty for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. ; Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2014 Apr; 28(13):1-5. PubMed ID: 24933742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Nunley PD; Jawahar A; Kerr EJ; Gordon CJ; Cavanaugh DA; Birdsong EM; Stocks M; Danielson G Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 21587111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China. Zhang X; Zhang X; Chen C; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Wang B; Yan W; Li M; Yuan W; Wang Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 21673620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up. Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Adjacent segment degeneration after cervical artificial disc replacement at early mid-term follow-up]. Yapu L; Xia H; Ai F; Shi L; Sui W Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 22568313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Double-level cervical total disc replacement for adjacent segment disease: is it a useful treatment? Description of late onset heterotopic ossification and review of the literature. Barbagallo GM; Certo F; Visocchi M; Sciacca G; Albanese V Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(1 Suppl):15-23. PubMed ID: 24825036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level cervical disc disease. Xing D; Ma XL; Ma JX; Wang J; Ma T; Chen Y J Clin Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 20(7):970-8. PubMed ID: 23375397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical results of cervical disc replacement with the Baguera C prosthesis after two years follow-up. Fransen P; Hansen-Algenstaedt N; Chatzisotiriou A; Noriega DCG; Pointillart V Acta Orthop Belg; 2018 Sep; 84(3):345-351. PubMed ID: 30840578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Femoral fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. Hartman CW; Garvin KL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2311-22. PubMed ID: 22258778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Sagittal alignment comparison of Bryan disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Yanbin Z; Yu S; Zhongqiang C; Zhongjun L J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Aug; 24(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 21150665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical comparison of 2 implantation systems for single-level cervical disk replacement. Shi R; Li J; Liu H; Ding C; Hu T; Li T; Gong Q Orthopedics; 2014 Feb; 37(2):e161-8. PubMed ID: 24679203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses. Brenke C; Scharf J; Schmieder K; Barth M J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Aug; 17(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 22657947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and radiographic results after treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease with the bryan disc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Wang Q; Cheng H; Mao Z; Qi X; Zhang M; Chen Y Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Dec; 77(6):809-15. PubMed ID: 22308628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Lawrence JP; Kershaw T; Nanieva R J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Apr; 2(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 15871478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical total disc replacement, part two: clinical results. Bertagnoli R; Duggal N; Pickett GE; Wigfield CC; Gill SS; Karg A; Voigt S Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 15950695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Motion preservation surgery in the spine. Murtagh R; Castellvi AE Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2014 May; 24(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 24792608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of carpentry on heterotopic ossification and mobility in cervical arthroplasty: determination by computed tomography with a minimum 2-year follow-up: Clinical article. Tu TH; Wu JC; Huang WC; Wu CL; Ko CC; Cheng H J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 22462570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]