These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22262425)

  • 1. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty.
    Labek G; Neumann D; Agreiter M; Schuh R; Böhler N
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 22262425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision rates after total ankle arthroplasty in sample-based clinical studies and national registries.
    Labek G; Klaus H; Schlichtherle R; Williams A; Agreiter M
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Aug; 32(8):740-5. PubMed ID: 22049859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
    Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades.
    Pabinger C; Bridgens A; Berghold A; Wurzer P; Boehler N; Labek G
    Hip Int; 2015; 25(5):394-401. PubMed ID: 25837781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers.
    Pabinger C; Berghold A; Boehler N; Labek G
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Feb; 21(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 23220555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is a Revision a Revision? An Analysis of National Arthroplasty Registries' Definitions of Revision.
    Liebs TR; Splietker F; Hassenpflug J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3421-30. PubMed ID: 25791442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data.
    Labek G; Sekyra K; Pawelka W; Janda W; Stöckl B
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Apr; 82(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 21434760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty in published literature and arthroplasty register data.
    Sadoghi P; Thaler M; Janda W; Hübl M; Leithner A; Labek G
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8):1349-53. PubMed ID: 23535284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality and reproducibility of French publications on total hip arthroplasty.
    Delaunay C; Iovanescu L; Necas L; Hochgatterer R; Labek G;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 May; 99(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23522871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.
    Schuh R; Neumann D; Rauf R; Hofstaetter J; Boehler N; Labek G
    Int Orthop; 2012 Jul; 36(7):1349-54. PubMed ID: 22350138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome of the cementless Taperloc stem: a comprehensive literature review including arthroplasty register data.
    Labek G; Frischhut S; Schlichtherle R; Williams A; Thaler M
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Apr; 82(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 21463220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Detection of inferior products in arthroplasty and implementation of findings: a retrospective analysis of the Boneloc incident].
    Liebensteiner M; Janda W; Williams A; Pawelka W; Labek G
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(6):683-8. PubMed ID: 20183745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex and risk of hip implant failure: assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes in the United States.
    Inacio MC; Ake CF; Paxton EW; Khatod M; Wang C; Gross TP; Kaczmarek RG; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Mar; 173(6):435-41. PubMed ID: 23420484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [German Total Ankle Replacement Register of the German Foot and Ankle Society (D. A. F.) - presentation of design and reliability of the data as well as first results].
    Kostuj T; Preis M; Walther M; Aghayev E; Krummenauer F; Röder C
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2014 Oct; 152(5):446-54. PubMed ID: 25313699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgeon, implant, and patient variables may explain variability in early revision rates reported for unicompartmental arthroplasty.
    Bini S; Khatod M; Cafri G; Chen Y; Paxton EW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Dec; 95(24):2195-202. PubMed ID: 24352773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outlier analysis in orthopaedics: use of CUSUM: the Scottish Arthroplasty Project: shouldering the burden of improvement.
    Macpherson GJ; Brenkel IJ; Smith R; Howie CR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():81-8. PubMed ID: 22262430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joint registries: what can we learn in 2016?
    Berry DJ
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):3-7. PubMed ID: 28042111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data.
    Goodfellow JW; O'Connor JJ; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Dec; 92(12):1628-31. PubMed ID: 21119165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision total joint arthroplasty: the epidemiology of 63,140 cases in New York State.
    Bansal A; Khatib ON; Zuckerman JD
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 23680502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arthroplasty registries around the world: valuable sources of hip implant revision risk data.
    Hughes RE; Batra A; Hallstrom BR
    Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med; 2017 Jun; 10(2):240-252. PubMed ID: 28337731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.