These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22262472)

  • 1. Assessment of coronary stent deployment using computer enhanced x-ray images-validation against intravascular ultrasound and best practice recommendations.
    Davies AG; Conway D; Reid S; Cowen AR; Sivananthan M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):419-27. PubMed ID: 22262472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of adequate coronary stent expansion using StentBoost, a novel fluoroscopic image processing technique.
    Mishell JM; Vakharia KT; Ports TA; Yeghiazarians Y; Michaels AD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jan; 69(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 17139686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced stent imaging improves the diagnosis of stent underexpansion and optimizes stent deployment.
    Sanidas EA; Maehara A; Barkama R; Mintz GS; Singh V; Hidalgo A; Hakim D; Leon MB; Moses JW; Weisz G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 22431198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel angiographic technique, StentBoost, in comparison with intravascular ultrasound to assess stent expansion.
    Yang FF; Zhang LW; Huang DS; Shen D; Sun HY; Zhang CH; Wang YM; Zhang XW; Bai J; Ma YJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Mar; 124(6):939-42. PubMed ID: 21518607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of optimum stent deployment by stent boost imaging: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Tanaka N; Pijls NH; Koolen JJ; Botman KJ; Michels HR; Brueren BR; Peels K; Shindo N; Yamashita J; Yamashina A
    Heart Vessels; 2013 Jan; 28(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22038109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis after optimal coronary stenting with initial quantitative coronary angiography guidance: an ATHEROREMO sub-study.
    Sarno G; Garg S; Gomez-Lara J; Garcia Garcia HM; Ligthart J; Bruining N; Onuma Y; Witberg K; van Geuns RJ; de Boer S; Wykrzykowska J; Schultz C; Duckers HJ; Regar E; de Jaegere P; de Feyter P; van Es GA; Boersma E; van der Giessen W; Serruys PW;
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Mar; 6(8):977-84. PubMed ID: 21330246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stent boost subtract imaging for the assessment of optimal stent deployment in coronary ostial lesion intervention: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Zhang J; Duan Y; Jin Z; Wei Y; Yang S; Luo J; Ma D; Jing L; Liu H
    Int Heart J; 2015; 56(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 25742941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment.
    Fearon WF; Luna J; Samady H; Powers ER; Feldman T; Dib N; Tuzcu EM; Cleman MW; Chou TM; Cohen DJ; Ragosta M; Takagi A; Jeremias A; Fitzgerald PJ; Yeung AC; Kern MJ; Yock PG
    Circulation; 2001 Oct; 104(16):1917-22. PubMed ID: 11602494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lesion characteristics and coronary stent selection with computed tomographic coronary angiography: a pilot investigation comparing CTA, QCA and IVUS.
    Kass M; Glover CA; Labinaz M; So DY; Chen L; Yam Y; Chow BJ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 22(7):328-34. PubMed ID: 20603505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound.
    Kwon W; Choi J; Kim JY; Kim SY; Yoon J; Choe KH; Lee SH; Ahn SG
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28 Suppl 1():21-31. PubMed ID: 22562285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multislice CT for assessing in-stent dimensions after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with three dimensional intravascular ultrasound.
    Roura G; Gomez-Lara J; Ferreiro JL; Gomez-Hospital JA; Romaguera R; Teruel LM; Carreño E; Esplugas E; Alfonso F; Cequier A
    Heart; 2013 Aug; 99(15):1106-12. PubMed ID: 23723447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography assessment of late in-stent restenosis: in vivo human correlation and methodological implications.
    Prati F; Pawlowski T; Sommariva L; Labellarte A; Manzoli A; Boccanelli A; Motolese M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2002 Oct; 57(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 12357511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is quantitative angiography sufficient to guide stent implantation? A comparison with three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images.
    Prati F; Gil R; Di Mario C; Ozaki Y; Bruining N; Camenzind E; de Feyter PJ; Roelandt JR; Serruys PW
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Apr; 27(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 9199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new intracoronary measurement catheter, MetriCath, compared to intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography in a stented porcine coronary model.
    van der Giessen WJ; Carlier SG; Regar E; van Beusekom HM; Foley DP; de Feyter PJ; Verdouw PD; Boersma E; Wolthuis R; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2002 Sep; 57(1):2-9; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 12203919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation.
    Kadohira T; Kobayashi Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2017 Jan; 32(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 27822889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of routine and intravascular ultrasound-guided high-pressure postdilatation after drug-eluting stent deployment: the STent OPtimization (STOP) study.
    Rana O; Shah NC; Wilson S; Swallow R; O'Kane P; Levy T
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 26(12):640-6. PubMed ID: 25480993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials.
    Doi H; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Yu A; Wang H; Mandinov L; Popma JJ; Ellis SG; Grube E; Dawkins KD; Weissman NJ; Turco MA; Ormiston JA; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1269-75. PubMed ID: 20129555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Laimoud M; Nassar Y; Omar W; Abdelbarry A; Elghawaby H
    Egypt Heart J; 2018 Mar; 70(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 29622993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy.
    Marwan M; Pflederer T; Schepis T; Seltmann M; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21245696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.