These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22262705)

  • 1. Coaching efficacy and exploratory structural equation modeling: a substantive-methodological synergy.
    Myers ND; Chase MA; Pierce SW; Martin E
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 33(6):779-806. PubMed ID: 22262705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coaching Competency and (Exploratory) Structural Equation Modeling: A Substantive-Methodological Synergy.
    Myers ND
    Psychol Sport Exerc; 2013 Sep; 14(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 23794951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Dicke T; Parker PD; Craven RG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):102-119. PubMed ID: 31204844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Illustration of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) Framework on the Passion Scale.
    Tóth-Király I; Bõthe B; Rigó A; Orosz G
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1968. PubMed ID: 29163325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data.
    Booth T; Hughes DJ
    Assessment; 2014 Jun; 21(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 24682748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the Dimensionality of Early Numeracy Using the Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.
    Dierendonck C; de Chambrier AF; Fagnant A; Luxembourger C; Tinnes-Vigne M; Poncelet D
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():680124. PubMed ID: 34239484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A confirmatory study of rating scale category effectiveness for the Coaching Efficacy Scale.
    Myers ND; Feltz DL; Wolfe EW
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2008 Sep; 79(3):300-11. PubMed ID: 18816941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects.
    Marsh HW; Nagengast B; Morin AJS
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1194-1218. PubMed ID: 22250996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The factor structure of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Serbia: an evaluation using exploratory structural equation modeling.
    Joshanloo M; Jovanović V
    J Ment Health; 2017 Dec; 26(6):510-515. PubMed ID: 27690711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing measurement invariance across Spanish and English versions of the physical self-description questionnaire: an application of exploratory structural equation modeling.
    Tomás I; Marsh HW; González-Romá V; Valls V; Nagengast B
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2014 Apr; 36(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 24686954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coaching competency and satisfaction with the coach: a multi-level structural equation model.
    Myers ND; Beauchamp MR; Chase MA
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(4):411-22. PubMed ID: 21184342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Examine the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale in a Representative Greek Sample.
    Tsigilis N; Gregoriadis A; Grammatikopoulos V; Zachopoulou E
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():733. PubMed ID: 29867688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The NEO Personality Inventory-Revised: factor structure and gender invariance from exploratory structural equation modeling analyses in a high-stakes setting.
    Furnham A; Guenole N; Levine SZ; Chamorro-Premuzic T
    Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22837539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of L2 grit among Chinese EFL high school students and its enduring effect on achievements: A bifactor model approach.
    Liu E; Wang J; Bai S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():971495. PubMed ID: 36248450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposed modifications to the conceptual model of coaching efficacy and additional validity evidence for the Coaching Efficacy Scale II-High School Teams.
    Myers N; Feltz D; Chase M
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Mar; 82(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 21462688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the factorial invariance of the 28-item DBQ across genders and age groups: an Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling study.
    Mattsson M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Sep; 48():379-96. PubMed ID: 22664704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When and how to use set-exploratory structural equation modelling to test structural models: A tutorial using the R package lavaan.
    Marsh H; Alamer A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Nov; 77(3):459-476. PubMed ID: 38361388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A New Look at the Factor Structure of the MHC-SF in Iran and the United States Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.
    Joshanloo M
    J Clin Psychol; 2016 Jul; 72(7):701-13. PubMed ID: 26990960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender of the Big Five Inventory Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.
    Chiorri C; Marsh HW; Ubbiali A; Donati D
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 25932664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.