95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22262913)
1. A need for more information uptake but not focused attention to access basic-level representations.
Poncet M; Reddy L; Fabre-Thorpe M
J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):15. PubMed ID: 22262913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects.
Walker S; Stafford P; Davis G
J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):21.1-12. PubMed ID: 18484860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual search without attentional displacement.
Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):9.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrimination of locomotion direction in impoverished displays of walkers by macaque monkeys.
Vangeneugden J; Vancleef K; Jaeggli T; VanGool L; Vogels R
J Vis; 2009 Apr; 10(4):22.1-19. PubMed ID: 20465320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exposure in central vision facilitates view-invariant face recognition in the periphery.
Harry B; Davis C; Kim J
J Vis; 2012 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 22338032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.
Helbig HB; Ernst MO
J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):21.1-16. PubMed ID: 18318624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.
Baldauf D; Deubel H
Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):549-63. PubMed ID: 18206205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the human reaction time based on natural image statistics in a rapid categorization task.
Mirzaei A; Khaligh-Razavi SM; Ghodrati M; Zabbah S; Ebrahimpour R
Vision Res; 2013 Apr; 81():36-44. PubMed ID: 23419619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
Amso D; Johnson SP
Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning in shifts of transient attention improves recognition of parts of ambiguous figure-ground displays.
Kristjánsson A
J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):21.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deployment of visual attention before sequences of goal-directed hand movements.
Baldauf D; Wolf M; Deubel H
Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(26):4355-74. PubMed ID: 17034829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct versus indirect processing changes the influence of color in natural scene categorization.
Otsuka S; Kawaguchi J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1588-97. PubMed ID: 19801618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Searching for life motion signals. Visual search asymmetry in local but not global biological-motion processing.
Wang L; Zhang K; He S; Jiang Y
Psychol Sci; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1083-9. PubMed ID: 20581341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateral masking, levels of processing and stimulus category: a comparative study between normal and dyslexic readers.
Pernet C; Valdois S; Celsis P; Démonet JF
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2374-85. PubMed ID: 16777147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semantic categorization precedes affective evaluation of visual scenes.
Nummenmaa L; Hyönä J; Calvo MG
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 20438250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Common neural substrates for visual working memory and attention.
Mayer JS; Bittner RA; Nikolić D; Bledowski C; Goebel R; Linden DE
Neuroimage; 2007 Jun; 36(2):441-53. PubMed ID: 17462914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
