These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22263423)

  • 1. A screening tool for selection of field odor assessors.
    Laor Y; Orenstein P; Ravid U; Baybikov R; Hanan A; Saadi I; Abbou Y
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Dec; 61(12):1353-60. PubMed ID: 22263423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field.
    Sucker K; Both R; Bischoff M; Guski R; Winneke G
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2008 May; 81(6):671-82. PubMed ID: 17932684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Odor frequency and odor annoyance Part II: dose-response associations and their modification by hedonic tone.
    Sucker K; Both R; Bischoff M; Guski R; Krämer U; Winneke G
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2008 May; 81(6):683-94. PubMed ID: 17906873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Difference in the odor concentrations measured by the triangle odor bag method and dynamic olfactometry.
    Ueno H; Amano S; Merecka B; Kośmider J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1339-42. PubMed ID: 19380999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study on the relationship between odor intensity and components concentrations of odor mixture].
    Yan LC; Liu JM; Fu HT; Sun Y; Lin WH
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Dec; 34(12):4743-6. PubMed ID: 24640917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An odor interaction model of binary odorant mixtures by a partial differential equation method.
    Yan L; Liu J; Wang G; Wu C
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Jul; 14(7):12256-70. PubMed ID: 25010698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proposal of Odor Nuisance Index as Urban Planning Tool.
    Invernizzi M; Capelli L; Sironi S
    Chem Senses; 2017 Feb; 42(2):105-110. PubMed ID: 28119355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Swine production impact on residential ambient air quality.
    Godbout S; Lemay SP; Duchaine C; Pelletier F; Larouche JP; Belzile M; Feddes JJ
    J Agromedicine; 2009; 14(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19657878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated Collection of Real-Time Alerts of Citizens as a Useful Tool to Continuously Monitor Malodorous Emissions.
    Brattoli M; Mazzone A; Giua R; Assennato G; de Gennaro G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 26927148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field olfactometry assessment of dairy manure land application methods.
    Brandt RC; Elliott HA; Adviento-Borbe MA; Wheeler EF; Kleinman PJ; Beegle DB
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 21520750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.
    Greenberg MI; Curtis JA; Vearrier D
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2013 Feb; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23387344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement of odor intensity measurement using dynamic olfactometry.
    Jiang J; Coffey P; Toohey B
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 May; 56(5):675-83. PubMed ID: 16739805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Residential exposure to outdoor air pollution from livestock operations and perceived annoyance among citizens.
    Blanes-Vidal V; Suh H; Nadimi ES; Løfstrøm P; Ellermann T; Andersen HV; Schwartz J
    Environ Int; 2012 Apr; 40():44-50. PubMed ID: 22280927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification and quantification of nuisance odors at a trash transfer station.
    Curren J; Hallis SA; Snyder CCL; Suffet IMH
    Waste Manag; 2016 Dec; 58():52-61. PubMed ID: 27692531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two dynamic measurement methods of odor and odorant emission rates from freshly dewatered biosolids.
    Wang T; Sattayatewa C; Venkatesan D; Noll KE; Pagilla KR; Moschandreas DJ
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Jun; 13(6):1746-52. PubMed ID: 21552636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring of odor compounds produced by solid waste treatment plants with diffusive samplers.
    Bruno P; Caselli M; de Gennaro G; Solito M; Tutino M
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 16713237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of odor emission rate from landfill areas using the sniffing team method.
    Nicolas J; Craffe F; Romain AC
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(11):1259-69. PubMed ID: 16360313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dispersion and analysis of odor pollution in landfill area under the enclosed operation condition].
    Lu P; Wu SX; Dai ZF; Zhang XH; Su ZH; Zhou XF; Dai ZG; Lu XF; Zheng B; Shen K; Wei PM
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Mar; 34(3):842-8. PubMed ID: 23745385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of setback distances for livestock operations using a new livestock odor dispersion model (LODM).
    Yu Z; Guo H
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Dec; 61(12):1369-81. PubMed ID: 22263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Odor composition analysis and odor indicator selection during sewage sludge composting.
    Zhu YL; Zheng GD; Gao D; Chen TB; Wu FK; Niu MJ; Zou KH
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):930-40. PubMed ID: 27192607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.