BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2226423)

  • 1. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies.
    Welbergen E; Kemper HC; Knibbe JJ; Toussaint HM; Clysen L
    Ergonomics; 1991 May; 34(5):613-24. PubMed ID: 1884712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate.
    Garg A; Saxena U
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Oct; 40(10):894-503. PubMed ID: 525616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
    Fernandez JE; Ayoub MM; Smith JL
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.
    Kumar S; Garand D
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):861-80. PubMed ID: 1633793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
    Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of semi-rigid lumbosacral orthosis use on oxygen consumption during repetitive stoop and squat lifting.
    Duplessis DH; Greenway EH; Keene KL; Lee IE; Clayton RL; Metzler T; Underwood FB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 9629064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
    Waikar A; Lee K; Aghazadeh F; Parks C
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.
    Wu SP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10424184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Blick AC; Wilkinson PL
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 2354696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysical determination of load carrying capacity for a 1-h work period by Chinese males.
    Wu SP; Chen CC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Sep; 44(11):1008-23. PubMed ID: 11693245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of visual estimation in classifying effort during a lifting task.
    Schapmire DW; St James JD; Townsend R; Feeler L
    Work; 2011; 40(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22130062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.