These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2226423)

  • 21. Maximum acceptable forces of dynamic pushing: comparison of two techniques.
    Ciriello VM; McGorry RW; Martin SE; Bezverkhny IB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 9973870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The physical and physiological workload of refuse collectors.
    Kemper HC; van Aalst R; Leegwater A; Maas S; Knibbe JJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Dec; 33(12):1471-86. PubMed ID: 2286195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Snook SH; Ciriello VM
    Ergonomics; 1991 Sep; 34(9):1197-213. PubMed ID: 1743178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Heart rate response to two lifting techniques.
    Revuelta N; Dauphin A; Kowslowski O; Dubois D; Thevenon A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 81(7):958-9. PubMed ID: 10896012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physiological and subjective responses to maximal repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat technique.
    Hagen KB; Hallén J; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1993; 67(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 8299594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ratings of perceived thigh and back exertion in forest workers during repetitive lifting using squat and stoop techniques.
    Hagen KB; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Nov; 19(22):2511-7. PubMed ID: 7855674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects on load handling of restricted and unrestricted shelf opening clearances.
    Mital A; Wang LW
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jan; 32(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 2924760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Can heaviness of the work for women be the same as for men?].
    Makowiec-Dabrowska T; Koszada-Włodarczyk W; Bortkiewicz A; Gadzicka E; Siedlecka J
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(6):469-82. PubMed ID: 20187495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determination of lifting abilities: a comparative study of four techniques.
    Khalil TM; Waly SM; Genaidy AM; Asfour SS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Dec; 48(12):951-6. PubMed ID: 3434537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for asymmetric lifting.
    Cheng TS; Lee TH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):1339-46. PubMed ID: 12929792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship between maximum acceptable work time and physical workload.
    Wu HC; Wang MJ
    Ergonomics; 2002 Mar; 45(4):280-9. PubMed ID: 12028725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychophysical capacity of industrial workers for lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically for 8 h work shifts.
    Mital A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):745-54. PubMed ID: 1633787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 1997 Aug; 28(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 9414362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Maximum acceptable frequency of lift for combined manual material handling task in Malaysia.
    Widia M; Md Dawal SZ; Yusoff N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216918. PubMed ID: 31141545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.