These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22264667)

  • 1. Practice makes perfect: reduction in female condom failures and user problems with short-term experience in a randomized trial.
    Beksinska M; Smit J; Joanis C; Hart C
    Contraception; 2012 Aug; 86(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 22264667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The female condom learning curve: patterns of female condom failure over 20 uses.
    Beksinska M; Smit J; Greener R; Piaggio G; Joanis C
    Contraception; 2015 Jan; 91(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25444717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative crossover study of the PATH Woman's Condom and the FC Female Condom.
    Schwartz JL; Barnhart K; Creinin MD; Poindexter A; Wheeless A; Kilbourne-Brook M; Mauck CK; Weiner DH; Callahan MM
    Contraception; 2008 Dec; 78(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 19014792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance and safety of the second-generation female condom (FC2) versus the Woman's, the VA worn-of-women, and the Cupid female condoms: a randomised controlled non-inferiority crossover trial.
    Beksinska ME; Piaggio G; Smit JA; Wu J; Zhang Y; Pienaar J; Greener R; Zhou Y; Joanis C
    Lancet Glob Health; 2013 Sep; 1(3):e146-52. PubMed ID: 25104263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term acceptability of the Reality polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype: a randomized crossover trial among South African women.
    Smit J; Beksinska M; Vijayakumar G; Mabude Z
    Contraception; 2006 Apr; 73(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 16531174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized noninferiority crossover controlled trial of the functional performance and safety of new female condoms: an evaluation of the Velvet, Cupid2, and FC2.
    Beksinska M; Greener R; Kleinschmidt I; Pillay L; Maphumulo V; Smit J
    Contraception; 2015 Sep; 92(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 26002805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of the Reality polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype: a randomized crossover trial among South African women.
    Beksinska M; Smit J; Mabude Z; Vijayakumar G; Joanis C
    Contraception; 2006 Apr; 73(4):386-93. PubMed ID: 16531173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of female and male condoms in preventing exposure to semen during vaginal intercourse: a randomized trial.
    Galvão LW; Oliveira LC; Díaz J; Kim DJ; Marchi N; van Dam J; Castilho RF; Chen M; Macaluso M
    Contraception; 2005 Feb; 71(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 15707563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The acceptability of the female and male condom: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kulczycki A; Kim DJ; Duerr A; Jamieson DJ; Macaluso M
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 15306269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Female condom use among women at high risk of sexually transmitted disease.
    Macaluso M; Demand M; Artz L; Fleenor M; Robey L; Kelaghan J; Cabral R; Hook EW
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(3):138-44. PubMed ID: 10894260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can condom users likely to experience condom failure be identified?
    Steiner M; Piedrahita C; Glover L; Joanis C
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(5):220-3, 226. PubMed ID: 8262171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Awareness of female condoms and failures reported with two different types in China.
    Wang X; Xi M; Zhang L; Jia L; Wang Y; Cheng Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Feb; 128(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 25458411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Frezieres RG; Walsh TL; Nelson AL; Clark VA; Coulson AH
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 10224546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breakage and slippage of condoms among users in north Gondar Province, Ethiopia.
    Mekonen E; Mekonen A
    East Afr Med J; 1999 Sep; 76(9):481-3. PubMed ID: 10685314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Condom slippage and breakage rates.
    Trussell J; Warner DL; Hatcher RA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 1601122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breakage and acceptability of a polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study.
    Frezieres RG; Walsh TL; Nelson AL; Clark VA; Coulson AH
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 9561872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problems with condoms may be reduced for men taking ample time to apply them.
    Crosby RA; Graham CA; Yarber WL; Sanders SA
    Sex Health; 2010 Mar; 7(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 20152099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decreased condom breakage and slippage rates after counseling men at a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Jamaica.
    Steiner MJ; Taylor D; Hylton-Kong T; Mehta N; Figueroa JP; Bourne D; Hobbs M; Behets F
    Contraception; 2007 Apr; 75(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 17362708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized crossover trial of the impact of additional spermicide on condom failure rates.
    Gabbay MB; Thomas J; Gibbs A; Hold P
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Oct; 35(10):862-8. PubMed ID: 18685543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Condom breakage and slippage among men in the United States.
    Grady WR; Tanfer K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1994; 26(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 8070546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.