218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22264970)
1. Modeling cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Hungary.
Vokó Z; Nagyjánosi L; Margitai B; Kövi R; Tóth Z; László D; Kaló Z
Value Health; 2012 Jan; 15(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22264970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quadrivalent human papilloma virus vaccine in Mexico.
Reynales-Shigematsu LM; Rodrigues ER; Lazcano-Ponce E
Arch Med Res; 2009 Aug; 40(6):503-13. PubMed ID: 19853192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis for Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus DNA testing and vaccination.
Chen MK; Hung HF; Duffy S; Yen AM; Chen HH
J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 21679279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of primary HPV screening for cervical cancer in Germany--a decision analysis.
Sroczynski G; Schnell-Inderst P; Mühlberger N; Lang K; Aidelsburger P; Wasem J; Mittendorf T; Engel J; Hillemanns P; Petry KU; Krämer A; Siebert U
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jul; 47(11):1633-46. PubMed ID: 21482103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests.
Kulasingam SL; Myers ER; Lawson HW; McConnell KJ; Kerlikowske K; Melnikow J; Washington AE; Sawaya GF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):321-8. PubMed ID: 16449119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An alternative cost effectiveness analysis of ThinPrep in the Australian setting.
Neville AM; Quinn MA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 45(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 16029294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of a cervical screening program with human papillomavirus vaccine.
Sopina E; Ashton T
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 21936972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cost-effectiveness of screening programs using single and multiple birth cohort simulations: a comparison using a model of cervical cancer.
Dewilde S; Anderson R
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):486-92. PubMed ID: 15358997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Suba EJ; Nguyen CH; Nguyen BD; Raab SS;
Cancer; 2001 Mar; 91(5):928-39. PubMed ID: 11251944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of HPV vaccination alongside cervical cancer screening programme in Slovenia.
Obradovic M; Mrhar A; Kos M
Eur J Public Health; 2010 Aug; 20(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 20624834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening.
Bidus MA; Maxwell GL; Kulasingam S; Rose GS; Elkas JC; Chernofsky M; Myers ER
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 107(5):997-1005. PubMed ID: 16648402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Perovic S
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Introducing HPV vaccine and scaling up screening procedures to prevent deaths from cervical cancer in Japan: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Yamamoto N; Mori R; Jacklin P; Osuga Y; Kawana K; Shibuya K; Taketani Y
BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 21794070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The potential cost-effectiveness of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to the cervical cancer screening programme in South Africa.
Sinanovic E; Moodley J; Barone MA; Mall S; Cleary S; Harries J
Vaccine; 2009 Oct; 27(44):6196-202. PubMed ID: 19698807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The costs, clinical benefits, and cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in HIV-infected women.
Goldie SJ; Weinstein MC; Kuntz KM; Freedberg KA
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jan; 130(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 10068381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The health and economic impact of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.
Wong G; Howard K; Webster A; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Transplantation; 2009 Apr; 87(7):1078-91. PubMed ID: 19352131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention.
Esselen KM; Feldman S
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 56(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 23318570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.
Sanders GD; Bayoumi AM; Sundaram V; Bilir SP; Neukermans CP; Rydzak CE; Douglass LR; Lazzeroni LC; Holodniy M; Owens DK
N Engl J Med; 2005 Feb; 352(6):570-85. PubMed ID: 15703422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
