These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22265058)
1. Drug reimbursement decision-making in Thailand, China, and South Korea. Ngorsuraches S; Meng W; Kim BY; Kulsomboon V Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S120-5. PubMed ID: 22265058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of pharmacoeconomic evaluations submitted for reimbursement in Korea. Yim EY; Lim SH; Oh MJ; Park HK; Gong JR; Park SE; Yi SY Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S104-10. PubMed ID: 22265055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of economic evaluation for guiding the pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand. Teerawattananon Y; Tritasavit N; Suchonwanich N; Kingkaew P Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):397-404. PubMed ID: 25444298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation on the first 2 years of the positive list system in South Korea. Park SE; Lim SH; Choi HW; Lee SM; Kim DW; Yim EY; Kim KH; Yi SY Health Policy; 2012 Jan; 104(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 22001369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharmacoeconomic guidelines and their implementation in the positive list system in South Korea. Bae EY; Lee EK Value Health; 2009; 12 Suppl 3():S36-41. PubMed ID: 20586979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement]. Hoomans T; van der Roer N; Severens JL; Delwel GO Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A958. PubMed ID: 20699045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eight-year experience of using HTA in drug reimbursement: South Korea. Bae EY; Hong JM; Kwon HY; Jang S; Lee HJ; Bae S; Yang BM Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 120(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 27086557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based decision-making in Asia-Pacific with rapidly changing health-care systems: Thailand, South Korea, and Taiwan. Jirawattanapisal T; Kingkaew P; Lee TJ; Yang MC Value Health; 2009; 12 Suppl 3():S4-11. PubMed ID: 20586980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National drug policies to local formulary decisions in Thailand, China, and Australia: drug listing changes and opportunities. Yoongthong W; Hu S; Whitty JA; Wibulpolprasert S; Sukantho K; Thienthawee W; Han H; Scuffham PA Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S126-31. PubMed ID: 22265059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A synthesis of drug reimbursement decision-making processes in organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. Barnieh L; Manns B; Harris A; Blom M; Donaldson C; Klarenbach S; Husereau D; Lorenzetti D; Clement F Value Health; 2014; 17(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 24438723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses to price and reimbursement decisions in Austria]. Führlinger S Wien Med Wochenschr; 2006 Dec; 156(23-24):612-8. PubMed ID: 17211765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do reassessments reduce the uncertainty of decision making? Reviewing reimbursement reports and economic evaluations of three expensive drugs over time. Sandmann FG; Franken MG; Steenhoek A; Koopmanschap MA Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 112(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 23628483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unravelling drug reimbursement outcomes: a comparative study of the role of pharmacoeconomic evidence in Dutch and Swedish reimbursement decision making. Franken M; Nilsson F; Sandmann F; de Boer A; Koopmanschap M Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Sep; 31(9):781-97. PubMed ID: 23839699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond. Rocchi A; Menon D; Verma S; Miller E Value Health; 2008; 11(4):771-83. PubMed ID: 18179658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation and pharmaceutical reimbursement reform in South Korea's National Health Insurance. Yang BM; Bae EY; Kim J Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 18180493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative analysis of the impact of a positive list system on new chemical entity drugs and incrementally modified drugs in South Korea. Ha D; Choi Y; Kim DU; Chung KH; Lee EK Clin Ther; 2011 Jul; 33(7):926-32. PubMed ID: 21715008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health economic evaluations in reimbursement decision making in the Netherlands: time to take it seriously? Franken M; Koopmanschap M; Steenhoek A Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):383-9. PubMed ID: 25444296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of health technology assessment on pharmaceutical reimbursement in selected middle-income countries. Oortwijn W; Mathijssen J; Banta D Health Policy; 2010 May; 95(2-3):174-84. PubMed ID: 20074829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of economic evidence in coverage decision-making in South Korea. Bae EY; Kim HJ; Lee HJ; Jang J; Lee SM; Jung Y; Yoon N; Kim TK; Kim K; Yang BM PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206121. PubMed ID: 30356251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different policy outcomes of the new drugs and currently listed drugs under the positive list system in South Korea. Lee EK; Kim BY; Lim JY; Park MH Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S100-3. PubMed ID: 22265054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]