These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting. Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models. Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks. Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling. Jäger M; Luttmann A Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting. Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing. Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the asymmetry multiplier in the 1991 NIOSH lifting equation adequately control the biomechanical loading of the spine? Lavender SA; Li YC; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19308820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands. Marras WS; Davis KG Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical response of a lumbar intervertebral disc to manual lifting activities: a poroelastic finite element model study. Natarajan RN; Lavender SA; An HA; Andersson GB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1958-65. PubMed ID: 18708928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of changes in lordosis on mechanics of the lumbar spine-lumbar curvature in lifting. Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M J Spinal Disord; 1999 Oct; 12(5):436-47. PubMed ID: 10549710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element. Shirazi-Adl A J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 16321628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of backpacks on the lumbar spine in children: a standing magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuschwander TB; Cutrone J; Macias BR; Cutrone S; Murthy G; Chambers H; Hargens AR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 20023607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight. Allread WG; Marras WS; Parnianpour M Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 8851536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data. Rohlmann A; Bauer L; Zander T; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 16549091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of six quantitative lifting tools to estimate spine loads during static activities. Rajaee MA; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Schmidt H Appl Ergon; 2015 May; 48():22-32. PubMed ID: 25683528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting. Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2637-48. PubMed ID: 16319750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task. Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder. Granata KP; Marras WS Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]