BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22265639)

  • 1. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes.
    Guillamondegui OD; Gunter OL; Hines L; Martin BJ; Gibson W; Clarke PC; Cecil WT; Cofer JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Apr; 214(4):709-14; discussion 714-6. PubMed ID: 22265639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Hutter MM; Rowell KS; Devaney LA; Sokal SM; Warshaw AL; Abbott WM; Hodin RA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 17084322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative.
    Daley BJ; Cecil W; Clarke PC; Cofer JB; Guillamondegui OD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):550-8. PubMed ID: 25728140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement: the power of hospital collaboration.
    Campbell DA; Englesbe MJ; Kubus JJ; Phillips LR; Shanley CJ; Velanovich V; Lloyd LR; Hutton MC; Arneson WA; Share DA
    Arch Surg; 2010 Oct; 145(10):985-91. PubMed ID: 20956768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution.
    Cima RR; Lackore KA; Nehring SA; Cassivi SD; Donohue JH; Deschamps C; Vansuch M; Naessens JM
    Surgery; 2011 Nov; 150(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 21875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.
    Osborne NH; Nicholas LH; Ryan AM; Thumma JR; Dimick JB
    JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):496-504. PubMed ID: 25647205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative: a legacy of Shukri Khuri.
    Campbell DA; Kubus JJ; Henke PK; Hutton M; Englesbe MJ
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S49-55. PubMed ID: 19874935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric: a beta phase report.
    Bruny JL; Hall BL; Barnhart DC; Billmire DF; Dias MS; Dillon PW; Fisher C; Heiss KF; Hennrikus WL; Ko CY; Moss L; Oldham KT; Richards KE; Shah R; Vinocur CD; Ziegler MM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Jan; 48(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 23331796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.
    Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Dimick JB; Richards KE; Raval MV; Fleisher LA; Hall BL; Ko CY
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 21109157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.
    Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Daley J; Jonasson O; Jones RS; Campbell DA; Fink AS; Mentzer RM; Neumayer L; Hammermeister K; Mosca C; Healey N;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18650645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
    Steinberg SM; Popa MR; Michalek JA; Bethel MJ; Ellison EC
    Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. PubMed ID: 18847652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apples and oranges: comparison of ACS-NSQIP observed outcomes with premier's quality manager-predicted outcomes.
    Lee LC; Reines HD; Sheridan MJ; Farmer BE; Martin J; Duan M
    Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 21835812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the safety of nonemergent operative procedures performed at night? A study of 10,426 operations at an academic tertiary care hospital using the American College of Surgeons national surgical quality program improvement database.
    Turrentine FE; Wang H; Young JS; Calland JF
    J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 20699739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.
    Bentrem DJ; Cohen ME; Hynes DM; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY
    Arch Surg; 2009 Nov; 144(11):1013-20. PubMed ID: 19917937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.
    Hall BL; Hamilton BH; Richards K; Bilimoria KY; Cohen ME; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2009 Sep; 250(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 19644350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Dimick JB; Chen SL; Taheri PA; Henderson WG; Khuri SF; Campbell DA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Oct; 199(4):531-7. PubMed ID: 15454134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary NSQIP results: a tool for quality improvement.
    Stachler RJ; Yaremchuk K; Ritz J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jul; 143(1):26-30, 30.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20620615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.
    Morris JA; Carrillo Y; Jenkins JM; Smith PW; Bledsoe S; Pichert J; White A
    Ann Surg; 2003 Jun; 237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. PubMed ID: 12796581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement.
    Rowell KS; Turrentine FE; Hutter MM; Khuri SF; Henderson WG
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 17544087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of resident participation in surgical operations on postoperative outcomes: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Kiran RP; Ahmed Ali U; Coffey JC; Vogel JD; Pokala N; Fazio VW
    Ann Surg; 2012 Sep; 256(3):469-75. PubMed ID: 22842127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.