These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22266169)

  • 1. Otoacoustic emissions in neonates measured with different acquisition protocols.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Hatzopoulos S; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 76(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 22266169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23116905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Pilka E; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 89():67-71. PubMed ID: 27619031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the Presence of Spontaneous Components Affect the Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions?
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 33480622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Otoacoustic emissions of full-term and preterm neonates].
    Kashiwamura M; Ohwatari R; Satoh N; Kawanami M; Chida E; Sakamoto T; Fukuda S; Inuyama Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jan; 99(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 8822259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contralateral suppression of linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates at risk for hearing loss.
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 17585930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of the number of averaged responses on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns.
    Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Nikolopoulos T; Korres GS; Economou NC; Ferekidis E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 16140396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interrelation of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Gobsch H; Tietze G
    Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):176-81. PubMed ID: 8226338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Otoacoustic emissions latency difference between full-term and preterm neonates.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Hatzopoulos S; Martini A; Blinowska KJ
    Hear Res; 2007 Sep; 231(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 17606343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of normal newborn transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions: ear asymmetries and sex effects.
    Berninger E
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):661-9. PubMed ID: 17978948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.
    Prieve BA; Hancur-Bucci CA; Preston JL
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19322090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression.
    Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in neonates and young children: a correlation and factor analytical study.
    Cacace AT; Pinheiro JM
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Jan; 112(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 11802056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Neonatal screening of deafness: evoked otoacoustic emissions or acoustic distortion products?].
    Roman S; Mondain M; Triglia JM; Uziel A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2001; 122(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 11799854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency hearing thresholds in children and adolescents.
    Groh D; Pelanova J; Jilek M; Popelar J; Kabelka Z; Syka J
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):90-8. PubMed ID: 16364580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in humans with endolymphatic hydrops.
    Haginomori SI; Makimoto K; Tanaka H; Araki M; Takenaka H
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 11192908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.