BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22266258)

  • 1. [Usefulness of new schemes to group Fuhrman grades in clinical practice for clear cell renal tumour].
    Morán E; Rogel R; Soto A; Ruiz-Cerdá JL; Budía A; Salom JV; Jiménez-Cruz JF
    Actas Urol Esp; 2012 Jun; 36(6):352-8. PubMed ID: 22266258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical analysis of a simplified Fuhrman grading scheme for prediction of cancer specific mortality in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma--Impact on prognosis.
    Becker A; Hickmann D; Hansen J; Meyer C; Rink M; Schmid M; Eichelberg C; Strini K; Chromecki T; Jesche J; Regier M; Randazzo M; Tilki D; Ahyai S; Dahlem R; Fisch M; Zigeuner R; Chun FK
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26520403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Relevance of the clinical-pathological predictive factors in force in chromophobe renal cell cancer].
    Pardo P; Rodríguez-Faba O; Palou J; Algaba F; Breda A; Esquena S; Villavicencio H
    Actas Urol Esp; 2012 Oct; 36(9):527-31. PubMed ID: 22365081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
    Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pathological prognostic indicators in renal cell carcinoma].
    Rey Rey J; León Ramírez D; López García S; Fernández Vázquez P; Benavente Delgado J; Ojea Calvo A
    Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 20223135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can renal mass biopsy assessment of tumor grade be safely substituted for by a predictive model?
    Jeldres C; Sun M; Liberman D; Lughezzani G; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Valeri A; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Descotes JL; Lechevallier E; Mulders PF; Perrotte P; Patard JJ; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2585-9. PubMed ID: 19836799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC): oncological outcomes and prognostic factors in a large multicentre series.
    Volpe A; Novara G; Antonelli A; Bertini R; Billia M; Carmignani G; Cunico SC; Longo N; Martignoni G; Minervini A; Mirone V; Simonato A; Terrone C; Zattoni F; Ficarra V; ;
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 22044519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collecting duct renal cell carcinoma: a matched analysis of 41 cases.
    Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Rioux-Leclercq N; de la Taille A; Novara G; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Schips L; Zigeuner R; Mulders PF; Lechevallier E; Coulange C; Valeri A; Descotes JL; Rambeaud JJ; Abbou CC; Lang H; Jacqmin D; Mejean A; Patard JJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1140-5. PubMed ID: 17336449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
    Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simplification of the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma.
    Smith ZL; Pietzak EJ; Meise CK; Van Arsdalen K; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
    Can J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(6):8069-73. PubMed ID: 26688135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-institutional validation of a symptom based classification for renal cell carcinoma.
    Patard JJ; Leray E; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Rodriguez A; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Artibani W; Abbou CC; Guillé F; Chopin DK; Lobel B
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 15310983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma.
    Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S;
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological follow-up study after radical nephrectomy.
    Zubac DP; Bostad L; Gestblom C; Kihl B; Seidal T; Wentzel-Larsen T; Bakke AM
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 17469026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proposal of an improved prognostic classification for pT3 renal cell carcinoma.
    Terrone C; Gontero P; Volpe A; Porpiglia F; Bollito E; Zattoni F; Frea B; Tizzani A; Fontana D; Scarpa RM; Rossetti SR
    J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18485380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fine-needle aspiration of renal cell carcinoma: is accurate Fuhrman grading possible on cytologic material?
    Bishop JA; Hosler GA; Kulesza P; Erozan YS; Ali SZ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Mar; 39(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 21319316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
    Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.