BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22268018)

  • 1. Mini-open versus open decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
    Harris EB; Sayadipour A; Massey P; Duplantier NL; Anderson DG
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Dec; 40(12):E257-61. PubMed ID: 22268018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
    Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Lee SH; Choi WG; Lim SR; Kang HY; Shin SW
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):644-9. PubMed ID: 15541696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spontaneous slip reduction of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis following circumferential release via bilateral minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note and short-term outcome.
    Pan J; Li L; Qian L; Zhou W; Tan J; Zou L; Yang M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 20714277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Blumenthal C; Curran J; Benzel EC; Potter R; Magge SN; Harrington JF; Coumans JV; Ghogawala Z
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 23373567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
    Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spinopelvic alignment after interspinous soft stabilization with a tension band system in grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Lee SH; Lee JH; Hong SW; Chung SE; Yoo SH; Lee HY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):E691-701. PubMed ID: 20535045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Shunwu F; Xing Z; Fengdong Z; Xiangqian F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):1615-20. PubMed ID: 20479702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
    Sears W
    Spine J; 2005; 5(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15749617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis through posterolateral fusion and fixation with pedicle screws].
    Chen KX; Yang QY; Liu XC; Li HJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2010 Apr; 23(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 20486373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
    Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Park JH; Hyun SJ; Roh SW; Rhim SC
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jul; 154(7):1205-12. PubMed ID: 22653494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies.
    Stevens KJ; Spenciner DB; Griffiths KL; Kim KD; Zwienenberg-Lee M; Alamin T; Bammer R
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 16760779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates.
    Wu RH; Fraser JF; Härtl R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(26):2273-81. PubMed ID: 20581757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uni- and bilateral instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine with local bone grafting: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up.
    Ohtori S; Koshi T; Suzuki M; Takaso M; Yamashita M; Yamauchi K; Inoue G; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Ochiai N; Kishida S; Kuniyoshi K; Aoki Y; Nakamura J; Ishikawa T; Arai G; Miyagi M; Kamoda H; Suzuki M; Furuya T; Toyone T; Takahashi K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1744-8. PubMed ID: 21544013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.