These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography. Gabbour M; Schnell S; Jarvis K; Robinson JD; Markl M; Rigsby CK Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 25487721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Eichenberger AC; Jenni R; von Schulthess GK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):971-7. PubMed ID: 8470612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive quantitation of blood flow turbulence in patients with aortic valve disease using online digital computer analysis of Doppler velocity data. Isaaz K; Bruntz JF; Da Costa A; Winninger D; Cerisier A; de Chillou C; Sadoul N; Lamaud M; Ethevenot G; Aliot E J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Sep; 16(9):965-74. PubMed ID: 12931109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Caruthers SD; Lin SJ; Brown P; Watkins MP; Williams TA; Lehr KA; Wickline SA Circulation; 2003 Nov; 108(18):2236-43. PubMed ID: 14568899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in patients requiring valve surgery: search for a 'gold standard'. Cujec B; Welsh R; Aboguddah A; Reeder B Can J Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 8(8):829-38. PubMed ID: 1423004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding. Schubert T; Bieri O; Pansini M; Stippich C; Santini F Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 24300842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Almeida AG; Sargento L; Gabriel HM; da Costa JM; Morais J; Madeira F; David C; Oliveira J; da Cunha JC; Vagueiro MC Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 May; 21(5):555-72. PubMed ID: 12174519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Flow-sensitive in-vivo 4D MR imaging at 3T for the analysis of aortic hemodynamics and derived vessel wall parameters]. Frydrychowicz A; Markl M; Harloff A; Stalder AF; Bock J; Bley TA; Berger A; Russe MF; Schlensak C; Hennig J; Langer M Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):463-72. PubMed ID: 17436180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of transesophageal echocardiography in diagnosis of diseases of native heart valves]. Niedermeyer J; Daniel WG Herz; 1993 Dec; 18(6):329-40. PubMed ID: 8307550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging. Matsue H; Sawa Y; Matsumiya G; Matsuda H; Hamada S J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16245502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flow and peak velocity measurements in patients with aortic valve stenosis using phase contrast MR accelerated with k-t BLAST. Thunberg P; Emilsson K; Rask P; Kähäri A Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2203-7. PubMed ID: 21724348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow-sensitive 4D MRI of the thoracic aorta: comparison of image quality, quantitative flow, and wall parameters at 1.5 T and 3 T. Strecker C; Harloff A; Wallis W; Markl M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1097-103. PubMed ID: 22745007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heart motion-adapted MR velocity mapping of blood velocity distribution downstream of aortic valve prostheses: initial experience. Kozerke S; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Paulsen PK; Pedersen EM; Boesiger P Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):548-55. PubMed ID: 11161177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advances in noninvasive assessment of valvular heart disease. Flachskampf FA; Lethen H Curr Opin Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 10(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 7787274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of valvular heart disease with Doppler echocardiography. Lee RT; Bhatia SJ; St John Sutton MG JAMA; 1989 Oct; 262(15):2131-5. PubMed ID: 2677426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The use of cross-sectional imaging modalities in the diagnosis of heart valve diseases]. Gutberlet M; Abdul-Khaliq H; Stobbe H; Fröhlich M; Spors B; Knollmann F; Lange P; Hetzer R; Felix R Z Kardiol; 2001; 90 Suppl 6():2-12. PubMed ID: 11826817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography]. Schmalz A; Erbel R; Wittlich N; Mohr-Kahaly S; Meyer J Z Kardiol; 1992 Nov; 81(11):619-26. PubMed ID: 1471399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional flow velocity quantification of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthesis by magnetic resonance imaging: surgical consideration. Matsue H; Sawa Y; Takahashi T; Matsumiya G; Ohtake S; Hamada S; Ueguchi T; Matsuda H Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):60-6. PubMed ID: 11805951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of cardiac catheterization upon management of advanced aortic and mitral valve disease. Leitch JW; Mitchell AS; Harris PJ; Fletcher PJ; Bailey BP Eur Heart J; 1991 May; 12(5):602-7. PubMed ID: 1874260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]