These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22268597)

  • 1. A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation.
    León AÁ; Medrano SM; Rosenfield M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Mar; 32(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 22268597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-examiner repeatability and agreement in accommodative response measurements.
    Antona B; Sanchez I; Barrio A; Barra F; Gonzalez E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 19663924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age and the amplitude of accommodation measured using dynamic retinoscopy.
    León A; Estrada JM; Rosenfield M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jan; 36(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 26353999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Dynamic Retinoscopy and Autorefraction for Measurement of Accommodative Amplitude.
    Aboumourad R; Anderson HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Sep; 96(9):670-677. PubMed ID: 31479022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation.
    Rosenfield M; Cohen AS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 May; 16(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 8977892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amplitude of Accommodation among Students of a Malaysian Private University as Assessed Using Subjective and Objective Techniques.
    Majumder C; Afnan H
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):219-226. PubMed ID: 32495530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability of two subjective accommodative amplitude measurements and agreement with an objective method.
    Chen Y; Zhang C; Ding C; Tao C; Bao J; Zheng J; Chen H
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Jul; 102(4):412-417. PubMed ID: 30866109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accommodative lag using dynamic retinoscopy: age norms for school-age children.
    McClelland JF; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):929-33. PubMed ID: 15592117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of target distance on accommodative amplitude measured using the minus lens technique.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Wolffsohn JS; Azimi A; Babaei-Malekkolaei E
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 23889500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accommodative amplitude using the minus lens at different near distances.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ng JS; Cesana BM; Yekta AA; Sedaghat MR
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 65(3):223-227. PubMed ID: 28440251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability intraexaminer and agreement in amplitude of accommodation measurements.
    Antona B; Barra F; Barrio A; Gonzalez E; Sanchez I
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 247(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 18791730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio.
    Escalante JB; Rosenfield M
    Optometry; 2006 May; 77(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 16651213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accommodative response/stimulus by dynamic retinoscopy: near add guidelines.
    Goss DA; Rana S; Ramolia J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 89(10):1497-506. PubMed ID: 22940782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accommodative accuracy by retinoscopy versus autorefraction spherical equivalent or horizontal meridian power.
    Nguyen AT; Wayne JL; Ravikumar A; Manny RE; Anderson HA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Nov; 101(6):778-785. PubMed ID: 29575034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer.
    Win-Hall DM; Ostrin LA; Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 17873774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Different Methods of Measuring Accommodative Amplitude with Hofstetter's Normative Values in a Ghanaian Population.
    Abu EK; Ocansey S; Yennu J; Asirifi I; Marfo R
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Sep; 43(9):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 29787692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective and subjective assessment of accommodative insufficiency.
    León A; Rosenfield M; Medrano SM; Durán SC; Pinzón CV
    Optom Vis Sci; 2024 Jan; 101(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 38350057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of four different binocular balancing techniques.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Goss DA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Sep; 97(5):422-5. PubMed ID: 25138746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of subjective heterophoria testing with a phoropter and trial frame.
    Casillas Casillas E; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 16614580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.