These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22268694)

  • 1. Individual differences in (non-visual) processing style predict the face inversion effect.
    Wyer NA; Martin D; Pickup T; Macrae CN
    Cogn Sci; 2012 Mar; 36(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 22268694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face perception in high-functioning autistic adults: evidence for superior processing of face parts, not for a configural face-processing deficit.
    Lahaie A; Mottron L; Arguin M; Berthiaume C; Jemel B; Saumier D
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Jan; 20(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 16460220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically.
    Richler JJ; Mack ML; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    Vision Res; 2011 Feb; 51(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 21130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autistic traits are linked to reduced adaptive coding of face identity and selectively poorer face recognition in men but not women.
    Rhodes G; Jeffery L; Taylor L; Ewing L
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2702-8. PubMed ID: 23994355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Specificity of face processing without awareness.
    Zhou G; Zhang L; Liu J; Yang J; Qu Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):408-12. PubMed ID: 20116293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors.
    Neiworth JJ; Hassett JM; Sylvester CJ
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16909230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability.
    Wang R; Li J; Fang H; Tian M; Liu J
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Feb; 23(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22222218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related brain potentials reveal anomalies in temporal processing of faces in autism spectrum disorder.
    McPartland J; Dawson G; Webb SJ; Panagiotides H; Carver LJ
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 45(7):1235-45. PubMed ID: 15335344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces.
    Anaki D; Zion-Golumbic E; Bentin S
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1407-16. PubMed ID: 17689102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Category-sensitivity in the N170 range: a question of topography and inversion, not one of amplitude.
    Boehm SG; Dering B; Thierry G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2082-9. PubMed ID: 21477606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnocellular visual evoked potential delay with high autism spectrum quotient yields a neural mechanism for altered perception.
    Sutherland A; Crewther DP
    Brain; 2010 Jul; 133(Pt 7):2089-97. PubMed ID: 20513659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autistic traits predict performance on the block design.
    Stewart ME; Watson J; Allcock AJ; Yaqoob T
    Autism; 2009 Mar; 13(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 19261684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between autistic traits and emotion adaptation to partially occluded faces.
    Luo C; Burns E; Xu H
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():21-36. PubMed ID: 28167115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect.
    Busigny T; Rossion B
    Cortex; 2010 Sep; 46(8):965-81. PubMed ID: 19683710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The eyes or the mouth? Feature salience and unfamiliar face processing in Williams syndrome and autism.
    Riby DM; Doherty-Sneddon G; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):189-203. PubMed ID: 18609381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The brain response to personally familiar faces in autism: findings of fusiform activity and beyond.
    Pierce K; Haist F; Sedaghat F; Courchesne E
    Brain; 2004 Dec; 127(Pt 12):2703-16. PubMed ID: 15319275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face and body perception in schizophrenia: a configural processing deficit?
    Soria Bauser D; Thoma P; Aizenberg V; Brüne M; Juckel G; Daum I
    Psychiatry Res; 2012 Jan; 195(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 21803427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.