BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22268720)

  • 1. The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection.
    Jennions MD; Kokko H; Klug H
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Mar; 25(3):591-8. PubMed ID: 22268720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic versus census estimators of the opportunity for sexual selection in the wild.
    Dunn SJ; Waits LP; Byers JA
    Am Nat; 2012 Apr; 179(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 22437175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The mismeasurement of sexual selection.
    Klug H; Heuschele J; Jennions MD; Kokko H
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Mar; 23(3):447-62. PubMed ID: 20088870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual ornaments and behavior.
    Head ML; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 18067568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates.
    Weir LK; Grant JW; Hutchings JA
    Am Nat; 2011 Feb; 177(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 21460553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection: harem size and the variance in male reproductive success.
    Wade MJ; Shulter SM
    Am Nat; 2004 Oct; 164(4):E83-9. PubMed ID: 15459886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bateman gradients in hermaphrodites: an extended approach to quantify sexual selection.
    Anthes N; David P; Auld JR; Hoffer JN; Jarne P; Koene JM; Kokko H; Lorenzi MC; Pélissié B; Sprenger D; Staikou A; Schärer L
    Am Nat; 2010 Sep; 176(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 20636132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geographical variation in the mating system of the dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae).
    Mobley KB; Jones AG
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jun; 16(12):2596-606. PubMed ID: 17561916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals.
    Janicke T; Morrow EH
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Mar; 21(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 29341415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of social and extra-pair mating on sexual selection in blue tits (cyanistes caeruleus).
    Schlicht E; Kempenaers B
    Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1420-34. PubMed ID: 23617918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Within-season variation in sexual selection in a fish with dynamic sex roles.
    Wacker S; Amundsen T; Forsgren E; Mobley KB
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3587-99. PubMed ID: 24917383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No evidence of current sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a bird with high variance in mating success.
    Westneat DF
    Am Nat; 2006 Jun; 167(6):e171-89. PubMed ID: 16609925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
    Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operational sex ratio, sexual conflict and the intensity of sexual selection.
    Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
    Ecol Lett; 2008 May; 11(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 18279355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection.
    Jones AG
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1673-84. PubMed ID: 19228185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual signals and mating patterns in Syngnathidae.
    Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
    J Fish Biol; 2011 Jun; 78(6):1647-61. PubMed ID: 21651521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual selection accounts for the geographic reversal of sexual size dimorphism in the dung fly, sepsis punctum (Diptera: Sepsidae).
    Puniamoorthy N; Schäfer MA; Blanckenhorn WU
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2117-26. PubMed ID: 22759289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental evolution exposes female and male responses to sexual selection and conflict in Tribolium castaneum.
    Michalczyk Ł; Millard AL; Martin OY; Lumley AJ; Emerson BC; Gage MJ
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):713-24. PubMed ID: 21091981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.