These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22268764)

  • 41. An integrative account of constraints on cross-situational learning.
    Yurovsky D; Frank MC
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():53-62. PubMed ID: 26302052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modeling cross-situational word-referent learning: prior questions.
    Yu C; Smith LB
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 22229490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Observing and Modeling Developing Knowledge and Uncertainty during Cross-situational Word Learning.
    Kachergis G; Yu C
    IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst; 2018 Jun; 10(2):227-236. PubMed ID: 33209986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Caregivers use gesture contingently to support word learning.
    Cheung RW; Hartley C; Monaghan P
    Dev Sci; 2021 Jul; 24(4):e13098. PubMed ID: 33550693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cross-Situational Word Learning With Multimodal Neural Networks.
    Vong WK; Lake BM
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Apr; 46(4):e13122. PubMed ID: 35377475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Integrating constraints for learning word-referent mappings.
    Monaghan P; Mattock K
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22245031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Using speech sounds to guide word learning: the case of bilingual infants.
    Fennell CT; Byers-Heinlein K; Werker JF
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(5):1510-25. PubMed ID: 17883445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An associative account of the development of word learning.
    Sloutsky VM; Yim H; Yao X; Dennis S
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Sep; 97():1-30. PubMed ID: 28641208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Looking in the wrong direction correlates with more accurate word learning.
    Fitneva SA; Christiansen MH
    Cogn Sci; 2011 Mar; 35(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 21429004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The robustness of learning through overhearing.
    Akhtar N
    Dev Sci; 2005 Mar; 8(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 15720377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Zipf's Law of Abbreviation and the Principle of Least Effort: Language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communication.
    Kanwal J; Smith K; Culbertson J; Kirby S
    Cognition; 2017 Aug; 165():45-52. PubMed ID: 28494263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Developmental Changes in Cross-Situational Word Learning: The Inverse Effect of Initial Accuracy.
    Fitneva SA; Christiansen MH
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Feb; 41 Suppl 1():141-161. PubMed ID: 26530044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How to Make the Most out of Very Little.
    Yang C
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Jan; 12(1):136-152. PubMed ID: 30861339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Negative transfer in human associative learning.
    Griffiths O; Johnson AM; Mitchell CJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 21859928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The temporal structure of naming events differentially affects children's and adults' cross-situational word learning.
    Benitez VL; Zettersten M; Wojcik E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Dec; 200():104961. PubMed ID: 32853966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Statistical word learning at scale: the baby's view is better.
    Yurovsky D; Smith LB; Yu C
    Dev Sci; 2013 Nov; 16(6):959-66. PubMed ID: 24118720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon.
    Jones MN; Mewhort DJ
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 17227180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Zipf's word frequency law in natural language: a critical review and future directions.
    Piantadosi ST
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1112-30. PubMed ID: 24664880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The learnability consequences of Zipfian distributions in language.
    Lavi-Rotbain O; Arnon I
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105038. PubMed ID: 35123219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Zipfian frequency distributions facilitate word segmentation in context.
    Kurumada C; Meylan SC; Frank MC
    Cognition; 2013 Jun; 127(3):439-53. PubMed ID: 23558340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.