These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22268786)

  • 1. Effects of connectivity and spatial resolution of analyses on conservation prioritization across large extents.
    Arponen A; Lehtomäki J; Leppänen J; Tomppo E; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 22268786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conservation of epiphyte diversity in an Andean landscape transformed by human land use.
    Köster N; Friedrich K; Nieder J; Barthlott W
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Aug; 23(4):911-9. PubMed ID: 19210304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of representation targets on the total area of conservation-area networks.
    Justus J; Fuller T; Sarkar S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 18445075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling functional landscape connectivity from genetic population structure: a new spatially explicit approach.
    Braunisch V; Segelbacher G; Hirzel AH
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3664-78. PubMed ID: 20723058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of weighting schemes on the identification of wildlife corridors generated with least-cost methods.
    Parks SA; McKelvey KS; Schwartz MK
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Feb; 27(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 23003217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating environmental gap analysis with spatial conservation prioritization: a case study from Victoria, Australia.
    Sharafi SM; Moilanen A; White M; Burgman M
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():240-51. PubMed ID: 22935646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Data to Use for Forest Conservation Planning? A Comparison of Coarse Open and Detailed Proprietary Forest Inventory Data in Finland.
    Lehtomäki J; Tuominen S; Toivonen T; Leinonen A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135926. PubMed ID: 26317227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying conservation areas on the basis of alternative distribution data sets.
    Underwood JG; D'Agrosa C; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 19659686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ecological-niche modeling and prioritization of conservation-area networks for Mexican herpetofauna.
    Urbina-Cardona JN; Flores-Villela O
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1031-41. PubMed ID: 20345399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multiscale network analysis of protected-area connectivity for mammals in the United States.
    Minor ES; Lookingbill TR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1549-58. PubMed ID: 20666801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Foraging behaviour of a frugivorous bat helps bridge landscape connectivity and ecological processes in a fragmented rainforest.
    Henry M; Pons JM; Cosson JF
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):801-13. PubMed ID: 17584386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Input data resolution affects the conservation prioritization outcome of spatially sparse biodiversity features.
    Tanhuanpää T; Mikkonen N; Kujala H; Heinaro E; Mäyrä J; Kumpula T
    Ambio; 2023 Nov; 52(11):1793-1803. PubMed ID: 37266861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of landscape elements in riparian buffers on the conservation of semiaquatic amphibians.
    Ficetola GF; Padoa-Schioppa E; De Bernardi F
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 18983602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The capacity of Australia's protected-area system to represent threatened species.
    Watson JE; Evans MC; Carwardine J; Fuller RA; Joseph LN; Segan DB; Taylor MF; Fensham RJ; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 20961332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tropical montane cloud forests: current threats and opportunities for their conservation and sustainable management in Mexico.
    Toledo-Aceves T; Meave JA; González-Espinosa M; Ramírez-Marcial N
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):974-81. PubMed ID: 21144641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America.
    Carroll C; McRae BH; Brookes A
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 22010832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conservation planning in forest landscapes of Fennoscandia and an approach to the challenge of countdown 2010.
    Mikusiński G; Pressey RL; Edenius L; Kujala H; Moilanen A; Niemelä J; Ranius T
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1445-54. PubMed ID: 18173468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of coarse-resolution models of species' distributions to guide local conservation inferences.
    Barbosa AM; Real R; Vargas JM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1378-87. PubMed ID: 20455912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Vital traits of woody species in High Andean forest edges of the Cogua Forest Reserve (Colombia)].
    Montenegro AL; Vargas O
    Rev Biol Trop; 2008 Jun; 56(2):705-20. PubMed ID: 19256438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Land-cover assessment of conservation and buffer zones in the BOSAWAS natural resource reserve of Nicaragua.
    Smith JH
    Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):252-62. PubMed ID: 12520380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.