159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22269088)
1. The impact of direct aperture optimization on plan quality and efficiency in complex head and neck IMRT.
Sabatino M; Kretschmer M; Zink K; Würschmidt F
Radiat Oncol; 2012 Jan; 7():7. PubMed ID: 22269088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rotational IMRT techniques compared to fixed gantry IMRT and tomotherapy: multi-institutional planning study for head-and-neck cases.
Wiezorek T; Brachwitz T; Georg D; Blank E; Fotina I; Habl G; Kretschmer M; Lutters G; Salz H; Schubert K; Wagner D; Wendt TG
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Feb; 6():20. PubMed ID: 21338501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deterministic direct aperture optimization using multiphase piecewise constant segmentation.
Nguyen D; O'Connor D; Ruan D; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5596-5609. PubMed ID: 28834556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dosimetry analysis of intensity-modulated and conformal radiation therapy for head and neck tumors].
Pesznyák C; Béla D; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 26035156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study.
Wu Q; Manning M; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 10656393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Organ sparing by conformal avoidance intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: dosimetric evaluation of coverage of pelvis and inguinal/femoral nodes.
Chen YJ; Liu A; Tsai PT; Vora NL; Pezner RD; Schultheiss TE; Wong JY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):274-81. PubMed ID: 16111597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship of segment area and monitor unit efficiency in aperture-based IMRT optimization.
Qi P; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4056. PubMed ID: 23652241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inverse treatment planning and stereotactic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of the tumor and lymph node levels for nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Description of treatment technique, plan comparison, and case study.
Münter MW; Debus J; Hof H; Nill S; Häring P; Bortfeld T; Wannenmacher M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Sep; 178(9):517-23. PubMed ID: 12426839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.
Dogan N; King S; Emami B; Mohideen N; Mirkovic N; Leybovich LB; Sethi A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Dec; 57(5):1480-91. PubMed ID: 14630288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans Using a ⁶⁰Co Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance Radiation Therapy System.
Wooten HO; Green O; Yang M; DeWees T; Kashani R; Olsen J; Michalski J; Yang D; Tanderup K; Hu Y; Li HH; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 26104932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model.
Fogliata A; Bolsi A; Cozzi L
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Jan; 66(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 12559518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
