These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22269199)

  • 1. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials' removal in primary teeth.
    Bittar DG; Murakami C; Hesse D; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22269199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of ultrasound and diamond burs treatments on microtensile bond strength.
    Conde A; Mainieri V; Mota EG; Oshima HM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 23059576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative cutting effectiveness of an ultrasonic diamond tip and a high-speed diamond bur.
    Lima LM; Motisuki C; Corat EJ; Santos-Pinto L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19357615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of operators' skills on increase in cavity volume of restorations.
    Dörter C; Yildiz E; Erdemir U
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 12674355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid layer width after conventional diamond, carbide and ultra-sound CVD burs.
    Pereira Nogueira P; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; do Rego MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 23342567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: Influence of cavity preparation with air abrasion.
    Barceleiro MO; de Mello JB; Porto CL; Dias KR; de Miranda MS
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):e242-7. PubMed ID: 22313931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations with ceramic inserts.
    Kuramoto M; Matos AB; Matson E; Eduardo CP; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):311-4. PubMed ID: 11764125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.
    Borsatto MC; Corona SA; Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; de Sá Rocha RA; Pecora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16948375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.