These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2226995)

  • 1. A hand-held OKP chart for the screening of glaucoma: preliminary evaluation.
    Damato BE; Chyla J; McClure E; Jay JL; Allan D
    Eye (Lond); 1990; 4 ( Pt 4)():632-7. PubMed ID: 2226995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
    Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new chart to improve the efficiency of glaucoma detection by oculokinetic perimetry.
    Stirling RJ; MacLeod JD; Vernon SA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 1)():121-4. PubMed ID: 8013705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Mutlukan E; Damato BE; Jay JL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 77(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 8318478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 4)():406-9. PubMed ID: 7821461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with a blue stimulus on a dark background.
    Wessels IF; Randhawa RS
    Eye (Lond); 1996; 10 ( Pt 5)():620-5. PubMed ID: 8977793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glaucoma screening with oculokinetic perimetry in general practice: is its specificity acceptable?
    Christoffersen T; Fors T; Waage S; Holtedahl K
    Eye (Lond); 1995; 9 ( Pt 6 Su)():36-9. PubMed ID: 8729017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the oculo-kinetic perimetry glaucoma screening test in a sub-Saharan African setting.
    Mahmoud AO; Omalase CO; Ekundayo K
    West Afr J Med; 2008 Jul; 27(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 19256315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Application of oculokinetic perimetry in examination of the eye].
    Wakakura M; Kageyama M; Hamanaka T; Shimizu K; Joshita H; Shimizu T; Baba H; Kisara M; Miyata M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jul; 100(7):551-7. PubMed ID: 8741340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the oculokinetic perimetry glaucoma screener with two types of visual field analyser.
    Greve M; Chisholm IA
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 28(5):201-6. PubMed ID: 8221366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
    Bruun-Jensen J
    Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clustering of fixation targets in multifixation campimetry.
    Mutlukan E; Damato BE; Tavadia SM
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():131-3. PubMed ID: 8325402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2201-4. PubMed ID: 10892863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with standard perimetric threshold testing.
    Felius J; Langerhorst CT; van den Berg TJ; Greve EL
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):221-6. PubMed ID: 1428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.