These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22270219)

  • 1. Comparison of global indices and test duration between two visual field analyzers: Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000.
    Garcia-Medina JJ; Garcia-Medina M; Zanon-Moreno V; Garcia-Maturana C; Cruz-Espinosa FJ; Pinazo-Duran MD
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 250(9):1347-51. PubMed ID: 22270219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices.
    Iester M; Mermoud A; Schnyder C
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 10690827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
    Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of early glaucomatous progression with octopus cluster trend analysis.
    Naghizadeh F; Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 24892507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between ocular pulse amplitude measured by dynamic contour tonometer and visual field defects.
    Vulsteke C; Stalmans I; Fieuws S; Zeyen T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Apr; 246(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 18193267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of matrix perimetry with octopus perimetry for assessing glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Lan YW; Hsieh JW; Sun FJ
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20436367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Iester M; Capris P; Altieri M; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Int Ophthalmol; 1999; 23(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 11196128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ability of 24-2C and 24-2 Grids to Identify Central Visual Field Defects and Structure-Function Concordance in Glaucoma and Suspects.
    Phu J; Kalloniatis M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 219():317-331. PubMed ID: 32621896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning effect and test-retest variability of pulsar perimetry.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Brusini P
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Mar; 22(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22027935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Prea SM; Kong YXG; Mehta A; He M; Crowston JG; Gupta V; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 190():9-16. PubMed ID: 29550190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
    Zeppieri M; Brusini P; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Salvetat ML
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 149(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 19800607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of Longitudinal Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Using Machine Learning.
    Yousefi S; Kiwaki T; Zheng Y; Sugiura H; Asaoka R; Murata H; Lemij H; Yamanishi K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 193():71-79. PubMed ID: 29920226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-pass resolution perimetry and light-sense perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 7492934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association between Rates of Visual Field Progression and Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Different Tonometers.
    Susanna BN; Ogata NG; Daga FB; Susanna CN; Diniz-Filho A; Medeiros FA
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Jan; 126(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 30114419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Evaluation of Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Faster Compared With Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Standard in Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma.
    Phu J; Khuu SK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 208():251-264. PubMed ID: 31470001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring Glaucomatous Focal Perfusion Loss in the Peripapillary Retina Using OCT Angiography.
    Chen A; Liu L; Wang J; Zang P; Edmunds B; Lombardi L; Davis E; Morrison JC; Jia Y; Huang D
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Apr; 127(4):484-491. PubMed ID: 31899032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry.
    Morales J; Weitzman ML; González de la Rosa M
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Jan; 107(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 10647732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.
    Grewal DS; Sehi M; Greenfield DS
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 127(11):1442-8. PubMed ID: 19901209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
    Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.