These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22270326)
1. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task. Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness. Manly T; Dobler VB; Dodds CM; George MA Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1721-8. PubMed ID: 16154447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers. Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking. Tomer R Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18342343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes. Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection. Arduino LS; Previtali P; Girelli L Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. Fink GR; Marshall JC; Weiss PH; Zilles K Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect. Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. McCourt ME; Jewell G Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length. Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective modulations of attentional asymmetries after sleep deprivation. Schmitz R; Deliens G; Mary A; Urbain C; Peigneux P Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3351-60. PubMed ID: 21871469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial attention and the mental number line: evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Longo MR; Lourenco SF Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1400-7. PubMed ID: 17157335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemispheric modulations of alpha-band power reflect the rightward shift in attention induced by enhanced attentional load. Pérez A; Peers PV; Valdés-Sosa M; Galán L; García L; Martínez-Montes E Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18789956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finding centre: ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance. Cavézian C; Valadao D; Hurwitz M; Saoud M; Danckert J Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 1437():89-103. PubMed ID: 22230669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial frequency-specific effects on the attentional bias: Evidence for two attentional systems. Singh VV; Stojanoski B; Le A; Niemeier M Cortex; 2011 May; 47(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 20447620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies. Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of the right superior temporal gyrus in stimulus-centered spatial processing. Shah-Basak PP; Chen P; Caulfield K; Medina J; Hamilton RH Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():6-13. PubMed ID: 29578025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task. Loftus AM; Vijayakumar N; Nicholls ME Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 19231481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults. Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]