These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22271871)

  • 1. The developmental trajectory of spatial listening skills in normal-hearing children.
    Lovett RE; Kitterick PT; Huang S; Summerfield AQ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):865-78. PubMed ID: 22271871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Ching TY; Zhang VW; Flynn C; Burns L; Button L; Hou S; McGhie K; Van Buynder P
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developmental effects and spatial hearing in young children with normal-hearing sensitivity.
    Schafer EC; Beeler S; Ramos H; Morais M; Monzingo J; Algier K
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e32-43. PubMed ID: 22688920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Galvin KL; Mok M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):702-13. PubMed ID: 20548238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment.
    Lovett R; Summerfield Q; Vickers D
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 23516964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of reducing the number of electrodes on spatial hearing tasks for bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Perreau A; Tyler RS; Witt SA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 20166312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Contribution of Individual Differences in Memory Span and Language Ability to Spatial Release From Masking in Young Children.
    MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Füllgrabe C; Eccles R; van der Linde J; Panebianco C; Fels J; Ljung R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 31619115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants.
    Rothpletz AM; Wightman FL; Kistler DJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):206-21. PubMed ID: 22436118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
    Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
    Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informational masking and spatial hearing in listeners with and without unilateral hearing loss.
    Rothpletz AM; Wightman FL; Kistler DJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):511-31. PubMed ID: 22215037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.