These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22272999)

  • 1. Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.
    Cunningham CE; Deal K; Rimas H; Campbell H; Russell A; Henderson J; Matheson A; Melnick B
    Patient; 2008 Dec; 1(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 22272999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling organizational justice improvements in a pediatric health service : a discrete-choice conjoint experiment.
    Cunningham CE; Kostrzewa L; Rimas H; Chen Y; Deal K; Blatz S; Bowman A; Buchanan DH; Calvert R; Jennings B
    Patient; 2013; 6(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 23371430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a Discrete Choice Conjoint Experiment to Engage Stakeholders in the Design of an Outpatient Children's Health Center.
    Cunningham CE; Niccols A; Rimas H; Robicheau R; Anderson C; DeVries B
    HERD; 2017 Oct; 10(5):12-27. PubMed ID: 28068858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.
    Cunningham CE; Hutchings T; Henderson J; Rimas H; Chen Y
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2016; 10():1359-72. PubMed ID: 27555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preferences for Early Intervention Mental Health Services: A Discrete-Choice Conjoint Experiment.
    Becker MP; Christensen BK; Cunningham CE; Furimsky I; Rimas H; Wilson F; Jeffs L; Bieling PJ; Madsen V; Chen YY; Mielko S; Zipursky RB
    Psychiatr Serv; 2016 Feb; 67(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 26369880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling the Mental Health Practice Change Preferences of Educators: A Discrete-Choice Conjoint Experiment.
    Cunningham CE; Barwick M; Short K; Chen Y; Rimas H; Ratcliffe J; Mielko S
    School Ment Health; 2014; 6(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24563679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment preference and patient centered prostate cancer care: Design and rationale.
    Jayadevappa R; Chhatre S; Gallo JJ; Wittink M; Morales KH; Bruce Malkowicz S; Lee D; Guzzo T; Caruso A; Van Arsdalen K; Wein AJ; Sanford Schwartz J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt B):296-301. PubMed ID: 26435200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing outcome preferences in patients with psychotic disorders: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.
    Zipursky RB; Cunningham CE; Stewart B; Rimas H; Cole E; Vaz SM
    Schizophr Res; 2017 Jul; 185():107-113. PubMed ID: 28038919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the problem-based learning preferences of McMaster University undergraduate medical students using a discrete choice conjoint experiment.
    Cunningham CE; Deal K; Neville A; Rimas H; Lohfeld L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 Aug; 11(3):245-66. PubMed ID: 16832708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.
    Cunningham CE; Deal K; Rimas H; Buchanan DH; Gold M; Sdao-Jarvie K; Boyle M
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1123-38. PubMed ID: 18481167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TOWARDS PATIENT-CENTERED CARE FOR DEPRESSION: CONJOINT METHODS TO TAILOR TREATMENT BASED ON PREFERENCES.
    Wittink MN; Cary M; Tenhave T; Baron J; Gallo JJ
    Patient; 2010; 3(3):145-157. PubMed ID: 20671803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elderly patients' experiences using adaptive conjoint analysis software as a decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee.
    Rochon D; Eberth JM; Fraenkel L; Volk RJ; Whitney SN
    Health Expect; 2014 Dec; 17(6):840-51. PubMed ID: 22994378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interim service preferences of parents waiting for children's mental health treatment: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.
    Cunningham CE; Chen Y; Deal K; Rimas H; McGrath P; Reid G; Lipman E; Corkum P
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 2013 Aug; 41(6):865-77. PubMed ID: 23435482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating service features to sustain engagement in early intervention mental health services.
    Becker M; Cunningham CE; Christensen BK; Furimsky I; Rimas H; Wilson F; Jeffs L; Madsen V; Bieling P; Chen Y; Mielko S; Zipursky RB
    Early Interv Psychiatry; 2019 Apr; 13(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 28836377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit community preferences in public health research: a case study of hospital services in South Australia.
    Jan S; Mooney G; Ryan M; Bruggemann K; Alexander K
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2000 Feb; 24(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 10777981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personal preferences for Personalised Trials among patients with chronic diseases: an empirical Bayesian analysis of a conjoint survey.
    Cheung YK; Wood D; Zhang K; Ridenour TA; Derby L; St Onge T; Duan N; Duer-Hefele J; Davidson KW; Kronish I; Moise N
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e036056. PubMed ID: 32513886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.